...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Midazolam premedication reduces propofol dose requirements for multiple anesthetic endpoints.
【24h】

Midazolam premedication reduces propofol dose requirements for multiple anesthetic endpoints.

机译:咪达唑仑的处方减少了用于多种麻醉终点的丙泊酚剂量需求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: This study investigates the interactions between midazolam premedication and propofol infusion induction of anesthesia for multiple anesthetic endpoints including: loss of verbal contact (LVC; hypnotic), dropping an infusion flex (DF; motor), loss of reaction to painful stimulation (LRP; antinociceptive) and attainment of electroencephalographic burst suppression (BUR; EEG). METHODS: In a double blind, controlled, randomized and prospective study, 24 ASA I-II patients received either midazolam 0.05 mg x kg(-1) (PM; n = 13) or saline placebo (PO; n = 11) i.v. as premedication. Twenty minutes later, anesthesia was induced by propofol infusion at 30 mg x kg(-1) x hr(-1). ED50, ED95 and group medians for times and doses were determined and compared at multiple anesthetic endpoints. RESULTS: At the hypnotic, motor and EEG endpoints, midazolam premedication significantly and similarly reduced propofol ED50 (reduction: 18%, 13% and 20% respectively; P <0.05 vs unpremedicated patients) and ED95 (reduction: 20%, 11% and 20% respectively; P <0.05 vs unpremedicated patients). For antinociception (LRP), dose reduction by premedication was greater for propofol ED95 (reduction: 41%; P <0.05 vs unpremedicated patients) than ED50 (reduction: 18%; P <0.05 vs unpremedicated patients). Hemodynamic values were similar in both groups at the various endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam premedication 20 min prior to induction of anesthesia reduces the propofol doses necessary to attain the multiple anesthetic endpoints studied without affecting hemodynamics in this otherwise healthy population. The interaction differs for different anesthetic endpoints (e.g., antinociception vs hypnosis) and propofol doses (e.g., ED50 vs ED95).
机译:目的:本研究调查了咪达唑仑的处方药与异丙酚输注诱导的多种麻醉终点之间的相互作用,这些终点包括:言语接触丧失(LVC;催眠),滴注输液弯曲(DF;运动),对疼痛刺激的反应丧失(LRP) ;抗伤害性)和获得脑电图猝发抑制(BUR; EEG)。方法:在一项双盲,对照,随机和前瞻性研究中,24例ASA I-II患者接受i.v.咪达唑仑0.05 mg x kg(-1)(PM; n = 13)或生理盐水安慰剂(PO; n = 11)。作为处方。二十分钟后,以30 mg x kg(-1)x hr(-1)的异丙酚输注诱导麻醉。确定ED50,ED95和组中位数的时间和剂量,并在多个麻醉终点进行比较。结果:在催眠,运动和脑电图终点,咪达唑仑的处方药显着降低丙泊酚ED50(减少:分别为18%,13%和20%;与未接受治疗的患者相比,P <0.05)和ED95(减少:20%,11%和分别为20%;相对于未接受药物治疗的患者,P <0.05)。对于抗伤害感受(LRP),丙泊酚ED95的预防性用药剂量减少更大(减少:41%;与未用药的患者相比P <0.05)比ED50(减少:18%; P <0.05对未用药的患者)。两组在各个终点的血流动力学值相似。结论:在诱导麻醉前20分钟进行咪达唑仑的预用药,可以减少达到研究的多个麻醉终点所必需的丙泊酚剂量,而不会影响这个健康人群的血液动力学。对于不同的麻醉终点(例如,抗伤害感受与催眠作用)和异丙酚剂量(例如,ED50与ED95),相互作用是不同的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号