...
首页> 外文期刊>Freshwater Biology >Combining taxon-by-trait and taxon-by-site matrices for analysing trait patterns of macroinvertebrate communities: a rejoinder to Monaghan & Soares (2014)
【24h】

Combining taxon-by-trait and taxon-by-site matrices for analysing trait patterns of macroinvertebrate communities: a rejoinder to Monaghan & Soares (2014)

机译:结合按特征分类和按位置分类的矩阵来分析大型无脊椎动物群落的特征模式:与Monaghan&Soares(2014)的结合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Monaghan and Soares (2014) suggested that combining traits with log-transformed abundance of taxa may cause anomalies in analyses of stream macroinvertebrate communities. While they addressed an important issue in stream ecology, here we present an opposite view. To identify the causes of these contrasting opinions, we carefully examined the examples provided by Monaghan and Soares (2014) and demonstrated how traits can be weighted by the presence, abundance and log-transformed abundance of the taxa in a meaningful way. We found that Monaghan and Soares (2014), following other authors, use the term weighting' differently from classical papers of stream ecology. The general practice is to calculate the sum of trait values multiplied by the abundance of each taxon and divide it by the total invertebrate abundance to get a community-level trait value. In contrast, Monaghan and Soares (2014) did not perform the final division and consequently did not get a standardised community-level trait value. It follows that the term weighting' is used with different meanings in stream ecology, and ecologists should keep these differences in mind. We agree with Monaghan and Soares (2014) that the addition of log-transformed data is equivalent to multiplication on an arithmetic scale. However, we disagree that this provides an inconsistent scaling that confounds quantitative analyses. Using example data sets, we illustrate how trait-based data analysis can be performed in community ecology in a meaningful way
机译:Monaghan and Soares(2014)提出,将性状与对数转换的分类单元数量相结合可能会导致河流无脊椎动物群落分析异常。当他们讨论河流生态学中的一个重要问题时,我们在这里提出了相反的观点。为了确定这些不同意见的起因,我们仔细研究了Monaghan和Soares(2014)提供的示例,并说明了如何通过有意义的方式通过类群的存在,丰度和对数转换丰度来加权特征。我们发现,与其他作者一样,Monaghan and Soares(2014)使用的术语“加权”与流生态学的经典论文有所不同。通常的做法是计算特征值的总和乘以每个分类单元的丰度,然后将其除以无脊椎动物的总丰度,得出社区水平的特征值。相比之下,Monaghan和Soares(2014)并未进行最终划分,因此未获得标准化的社区级特征值。因此,术语“权重”在河流生态学中具有不同的含义,生态学家应牢记这些差异。我们同意Monaghan和Soares(2014)的观点,即对数转换后的数据的加法等效于算术规模上的乘法。但是,我们不同意这提供了不一致的缩放比例,从而混淆了定量分析。使用示例数据集,我们说明了如何以有意义的方式在社区生态学中进行基于特征的数据分析

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号