...
首页> 外文期刊>Foodborne pathogens and disease >Isolation of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli from Ground Beef Using Multiple Combinations of Enrichment Broths and Selective Agars
【24h】

Isolation of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli from Ground Beef Using Multiple Combinations of Enrichment Broths and Selective Agars

机译:使用浓缩肉汤和选择性琼脂的多种组合从绞碎牛肉中分离产生志贺毒素的大肠杆菌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are foodborne pathogens, and beef cattle are recognized as the principal reservoir. The aims of this study were (1) to identify the most sensitive combination of selective enrichment broths and agars for STEC isolation in artificially inoculated ground beef samples, and (2) to evaluate the most efficient combination(s) of methods for naturally contaminated ground beef samples. A total of 192 ground beef samples were artificially inoculated with STEC and non-stx bacterial strains. A combination of four enrichment broths and three agars were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for STEC isolation from experimentally inoculated samples. Enrichments with either modified tryptic soy broth (mTSB) containing 8mg/L novobiocin (mTSB-8) or modified Escherichia coli (mEC) broth followed by isolation in MacConkey agar were the most sensitive combinations for STEC isolation of artificially inoculated samples. Independently, both enrichments media followed by isolation in MacConkey were used to evaluate ground beef samples from 43 retail stores, yielding 65.1% and 58.1% stx-positive samples by RT-PCR, respectively. No difference was observed in the isolate proportions between these two methods (8/25 [32%] and 8/28 [28.6%]). Identical serotypes and stx genotypes were observed in STEC strains isolated from the same samples by either method. In this study, no single enrichment protocol was sufficient to detect all STEC in artificially inoculated samples and had considerable variation in detection ability with naturally contaminated samples. Moreover, none of the single or combinations of multiple isolation agars used were capable of identifying all STEC serogroups in either artificially inoculated or naturally occurring STEC-contaminated ground beef. Therefore, it may be prudent to conclude that there is no single method or combination of isolation methods capable of identifying all STEC serogroups.
机译:产生志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)是食源性病原体,肉牛被认为是主要的病原体。这项研究的目的是(1)找出在人工接种的碎牛肉样品中用于STEC分离的选择性浓缩肉汤和琼脂的最敏感组合,以及(2)评估天然污染的地面的最有效方法组合牛肉样品。将总共​​192个碎牛肉样品人工接种了STEC和非stx细菌菌株。评估了四种富集肉汤和三种琼脂的组合,用于从实验接种样品中分离STEC的敏感性,特异性和阳性预测值。含有8mg / L新霉素(mTSB-8)的改良胰蛋白tic大豆肉汤(mTSB-8)或改良Escherichia coli(mEC)肉汤的浓缩,然后在MacConkey琼脂中进行分离,是对STEC分离人工接种样品最敏感的组合。独立地,两种富集培养基,然后在MacConkey中进行分离,均用于评估43家零售店的碎牛肉样品,通过RT-PCR分别获得65.1%和58.1%的stx阳性样品。两种方法之间的分离物比例没有差异(8/25 [32%]和8/28 [28.6%])。通过两种方法从相同样品中分离出的STEC菌株均观察到相同的血清型和stx基因型。在这项研究中,没有任何一种富集方案足以检测人工接种样品中的所有STEC,并且对自然污染样品的检测能力也存在很大差异。而且,所用的单个或多个分离琼脂的组合均不能鉴定出人工接种或天然存在的受STEC污染的碎牛肉中的所有STEC血清群。因此,可能明智的结论是,没有能够识别所有STEC血清群的单一方法或分离方法的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号