...
首页> 外文期刊>Foot and ankle international >Comparison of the results of the Weil and Helal osteotomies for the treatment of metatarsalgia secondary to dislocation of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints.
【24h】

Comparison of the results of the Weil and Helal osteotomies for the treatment of metatarsalgia secondary to dislocation of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints.

机译:比较Weil和Helical截骨术治疗小meta趾关节脱位继发的s骨痛的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 30 patients who were treated surgically for metatarsalgia resulting from dislocation of one or more lesser metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints. We used two treatments, including an osteotomy of the metatarsal head (Weil osteotomy, N = 15) or an osteotomy of the metatarsal shaft (Helal osteotomy, N = 15). Before surgery, all patients had been treated with various nonoperative modalities for a minimum of 6 months. Between 1991 and 1993, 15 consecutive patients underwent a Helal osteotomy (22 metatarsals), and 15 consecutive patients were subsequently treated between 1994 and 1995 with a Weil osteotomy (25 metatarsals). All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean follow-up period of 22 months (range, 12-39 months), noting especially persistent subluxation or dislocation, recurrent metatarsalgia, and transfer lesions. Patients managed with a Weil osteotomy had significantly higher satisfaction (P = 0.049), lower incidence of recurrent metatarsalgia (0 vs. 27%, P = 0.107), and fewer transfer lesions (0 vs. 41%, P = < 0.001) than those managed with a Helal osteotomy. Furthermore, those managed with the Weil procedure had a higher percentage of radiographic reduction and maintenance of the MTP joint dislocation (21 of 25, 84%; vs. 8 of 22, 36%; P = 0.002) than those managed with the Helal procedure. In the Weil group, there was also no malunion or pseudoarthrosis; in the Helal group there were five malunions and three pseudoarthroses. Although the follow-up period for the Weil osteotomy (15 months) was shorter than that for the Helal osteotomy (26 months), the former group had higher American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society forefoot scores, which were significantly different from the results attained with the Helal osteotomy. A telephone update was performed on the Weil osteotomy group at an average of 27 months postsurgery, and no patient had experienced changes since the clinical follow-up. We concluded that the Weil procedure is a satisfactory method for correcting metatarsalgia caused by dislocation of the MTP joint and that, because of the high complication rate, the Helal osteotomy is not an acceptable procedure for correcting this condition.
机译:我们回顾性地回顾了30例因one骨头或趾骨小关节(MTP)关节脱位而导致的meta骨痛的手术治疗患者的结果。我们使用了两种治疗方法,包括an骨头的截骨术(Weil截骨术,N = 15)或the骨干的截骨术(Helal截骨术,N = 15)。手术前,所有患者均已接受各种非手术方式治疗至少6个月。 1991年至1993年间,连续15例患者接受了Helal截骨术(22个meta骨),1994年至1995年之间连续15例患者接受了Weil截骨术(25个meta骨)。所有患者均经过22个月(范围12-39个月)的平均随访期临床和影像学评估,特别是持续性半脱位或脱位,meta骨复发和转移灶。与Weil截骨术相比,患者的满意度明显提高(P = 0.049),复发性tar骨痛的发生率较低(0 vs. 27%,P = 0.107),转移灶较少(0 vs. 41%,P = <0.001)那些接受了Helal截骨术的患者。此外,与采用Helal手术的患者相比,采用Weil手术的患者的放射线照相术减少和维持MTP关节脱位的比例更高(21例,占25%,84%; vs 8例,22%,36%; P = 0.002) 。在韦尔组中,也没有畸形畸形或假性关节炎。在Helal组中,有五个畸形畸形的人和三个伪关节炎。尽管Weil截骨术的随访时间(15个月)比Helal截骨术的随访时间(26个月)短,但前一组的美国骨科足踝学会前脚评分较高,与前者的结果明显不同。螺旋截骨术。 Weil截骨术组平均在手术后27个月进行了电话更新,自临床随访以来,没有患者发生变化。我们得出的结论是,Weil手术是纠正因MTP关节脱位而引起的meta骨痛的令人满意的方法,并且由于并发症的发生率很高,Helical截骨术不是纠正这种情况的可接受方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号