首页> 外文期刊>Foot and ankle international >Severity of diabetic foot infection and rate of limb salvage
【24h】

Severity of diabetic foot infection and rate of limb salvage

机译:糖尿病足感染的严重程度和肢体抢救率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Foot infections are limb-threatening complications in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), and proper classification of the severity of diabetic foot infection (DFI) is important in determining an effective antibiotic regimen, the need for hospitalization and surgery, and the risk of amputation. Our hypothesis was that patients with severe DFI would have a longer hospitalization than those with moderate DFI. The purposed of this study was 2-fold. The first purpose was to define DFI using readily available clinical information and objective parameters outlined by consensus statements. The second purpose of this study was to assess rates of amputation and limb salvage for hospitalized patients with DFI. Methods: The database of a single academic foot and ankle program was reviewed for patients who were hospitalized for a DFI from 2006 to 2011. Inpatient and outpatient electronic medical records identified 100 patients. Severe DFI was defined as having 2 or more objective findings of systemic toxicity and/or metabolic instability at the time of initial assessment. Results: The length of stay was significantly shorter for patients with a moderate infection than for those with a severe infection (median 5 days vs 8 days, P = .021). A nonsignificant trend was observed that indicated higher rates of limb salvage in patients with moderate infections compared with patients with severe infections (94% vs 80%, P = .081). Conclusion: Patients with severe DFI had a median hospital stay that was 60% longer than that of patients with moderate DFI. In this sample, 55% of patients with a severe DFI required some type of amputation compared with 42% of patients with a moderate DFI. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective control cohort study.
机译:背景:足部感染是糖尿病患者(DM)的威胁肢体的并发症,对糖尿病足感染(DFI)的严重程度进行正确分类对于确定有效的抗生素治疗方案,住院和手术的必要性以及风险非常重要。截肢。我们的假设是重度DFI患者的住院时间要比中度DFI患者更长。这项研究的目的是2倍。第一个目的是使用容易获得的临床信息和共识声明概述的客观参数定义DFI。这项研究的第二个目的是评估DFI住院患者的截肢率和肢体抢救率。方法:对2006年至2011年因DFI住院的患者的单一学术足踝计划数据库进行了回顾。住院和门诊电子病历确定了100例患者。严重DFI被定义为在初次评估时有2个或更多客观发现的全身毒性和/或代谢不稳定。结果:中度感染患者的住院时间明显短于重度感染患者的住院时间(中位5天vs 8天,P = .021)。观察到无显着趋势,表明中度感染患者的肢体挽救率高于严重感染患者(94%vs 80%,P = .081)。结论:重度DFI患者的中位住院时间比中度DFI患者长60%。在该样本中,有55%的严重DFI患者需要某种截肢,而有42%的中度DFI患者需要截肢。证据级别:III级,回顾性对照队列研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号