首页> 外文期刊>Foot and ankle clinics >Systematic review of treatment strategies for osteochondral defects of the talar dome.
【24h】

Systematic review of treatment strategies for osteochondral defects of the talar dome.

机译:系统评价距骨穹osteo骨软骨缺损的治疗策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to summarize all eligible studies to compare the effectiveness of different treatment strategies for osteochondral defects (OCD) of the talus. Electronic databases from January 1966 to June 2000 were systematically screened. Based on our inclusion criteria, 39 studies describing the results of treatment strategies for OCD of the talus were included. No randomized clinical trials (RCT) were identified. Fourteen studies described the results of nonoperative treatment (NT); 4: the results of excision alone; 10: the results of excision and curettage (EC); 21: the results of excision, curettage, and drilling (ECD); 2: the results of cancellous bone grafting after EC; 1: the results of osteorchondral transplantation; 3: the results of fixation; and 1: the results of retrograde drilling. The average success rate of NT was 45%. Comparison of different surgical procedures showed that the highest average success rate is reached by excision, curettage, and drilling (ECD; 86%), followed by excision and curettage (EC; 78%) and excision alone (38%). On the basis of this systematic review, we conclude that NT and excision alone are not to be recommended in treating talar OCD. Both EC and ECD have been shown to lead to a high percentage good/excellent results. At the present time, ECD seems to be the most effective treatment strategy for osteochondral defect of the talus. Due to great diversity in the articles and variability in treatment results, however, no definitive conclusions can be drawn. Sufficiently powered randomized clinical trials with uniform methodology and validated outcome measures should be initiated to compare the outcome of surgical strategies for OCD of the talus.
机译:这项研究的目的是总结所有符合条件的研究,以比较不同治疗策略治疗距骨的骨软骨缺损(OCD)的有效性。系统筛选了1966年1月至2000年6月的电子数据库。根据我们的纳入标准,纳入了39项描述距骨OCD治疗策略结果的研究。尚未确定随机临床试验(RCT)。十四项研究描述了非手术治疗(NT)的结果; 4:单独切除的结果; 10:切除和刮除的结果(EC); 21:切除,刮除和钻孔(ECD)的结果; 2:EC后松质骨移植的结果; 1:骨软骨移植的结果; 3:注视结果; 1:逆行钻探的结果。 NT的平均成功率为45%。不同手术程序的比较表明,切除,刮除和钻孔(ECD; 86%),其次是切除和刮除(EC; 78%),单独切除(38%),可以达到最高的平均成功率。根据这一系统评价,我们得出结论,不建议单独使用NT和切除术治疗距骨OCD。事实证明,EC和ECD均可导致高百分比的良好/优异结果。目前,ECD似乎是治疗距骨骨软骨缺损最有效的策略。由于文章的多样性和治疗结果的差异,因此无法得出明确的结论。应该启动具有统一方法学和经过验证的结局指标的足够有力的随机临床试验,以比较距骨OCD手术策略的结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号