首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Dental age estimation using demirjian and willems methods: Cross sectional study on children from the former yugoslav republic of macedonia
【24h】

Dental age estimation using demirjian and willems methods: Cross sectional study on children from the former yugoslav republic of macedonia

机译:使用demirjian和willems方法估算牙科年龄:前南斯拉夫的马其顿共和国儿童的横断面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To evaluate applicability of Demirjian and Willems methods for calculating dental age of children in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia we analyzed panoramic radiographs of 966 children (485 female and 481 male, aged 6-13 years) treated at the University and Community Dental Clinics in Skopje using four Demirjian methods and a Willems method for determining dental ages. Intra-rater and inter-rater agreement of mineralization stages were 0.86 and 0.82, respectively. All methods significantly overestimated dental age when compared to the chronological age (p0.001). In males, the lowest overestimation was shown using Willems method (0.52±0.87 years), followed by Demirjian methods from 1976 using PM1, PM2, M1, M2 teeth (0.69±0.92 years) and using I2, PM1, PM2, M2 teeth (0.80±0.98 years). The greatest overestimation were shown using Demirjian methods using 7 teeth from 1976 (0.92±0.99 years) and method from 1973 (1.06±1.07 years). In females, the lowest overestimation was shown using Willems method (0.33±0.83 years) than the Demirjian method using PM1, PM2, M1, M2 teeth (1.00±1.01 years), following methods from 1976 using 7 teeth (1.03±1.01 years) and I2, PM1, PM2, M2 teeth (1.12±0.96 years). The greatest overestimation was for method from 1973 using 7 teeth (1.17±0.98 years). Willems method was the most accurate while Demirjian's methods for dental age calculation are not suitable on children from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
机译:为了评估Demirjian和Willems方法在前南斯拉夫的马其顿共和国计算儿童牙齿年龄的适用性,我们对在大学和社区牙科诊所接受治疗的966名儿童(485名女性和481名男性,年龄6-13岁)进行了全景射线照相。斯科普里使用四种Demirjian方法和Willems方法确定牙齿年龄。矿化阶段的等级内和等级间一致性分别为0.86和0.82。与按时间顺序的年龄相比,所有方法均明显高估了牙齿的年龄(p <0.001)。在男性中,使用Willems方法(0.52±0.87年)显示最低的高估,然后是从1976年开始使用PM1,PM2,M1,M2牙齿(0.69±0.92岁)和使用I2,PM1,PM2,M2牙齿的Demirjian方法( 0.80±0.98年)。使用Demirjian方法显示了最大的高估,该方法使用了1976年(0.92±0.99年)的7颗牙齿和1973年(1.06±1.07年)的方法。在女性中,使用Willems方法(0.33±0.83年)的最低估计值高于使用PM1,PM2,M1,M2牙齿的Demirjian方法(1.00±1.01年),从1976年开始使用7个牙齿(1.03±1.01年)和I2,PM1,PM2,M2牙齿(1.12±0.96岁)。从1973年开始,最大的高估方法是使用7颗牙齿(1.17±0.98年)。 Willems方法是最准确的方法,而Demirjian的牙齿年龄计算方法不适用于前南斯拉夫的马其顿共和国的儿童。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号