首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Prevalence of medicinal drugs in suspected impaired drivers and a comparison with the use in the general Dutch population
【24h】

Prevalence of medicinal drugs in suspected impaired drivers and a comparison with the use in the general Dutch population

机译:可疑的驾驶员中药用药物的使用率及其与荷兰一般人群使用情况的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of psychotropic medicines in drivers suspected of driving under the influence of medicinal and illicit drugs in The Netherlands and to compare the prevalence of selected impairing medicines with the use of these medicines in the general Dutch population. In total, 3038 blood samples of suspected impaired drivers in The Netherlands have been analyzed for the presence of medicinal and illicit drugs between January 2009 and December 2012. In 94% (2842/3038) of the cases medicinal and/or illicit drugs were detected. Medicinal drugs were found in 33% of the blood samples, with the highest prevalence for anxiolytics. In 86% of the cases illicit drug-positive results were obtained, with the highest prevalence for cannabis. At least in 56% of the blood samples poly-drug use was determined, including medicinal and/or illicit drugs. The highest prevalence of poly-medicine use was found for combinations including anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs. In general, the prevalence of driving impairing medicines in suspected impaired drivers is higher than the use of these medicines in the general Dutch population, due to a positive selection bias in the first population. Differences between both populations may be explained by the used methodological approach (e.g., classification criteria of analytical findings, sample selection bias) and abuse of certain medicinal drugs (e.g., diazepam). Negative effects of medicinal drugs on driving performance determine largely the prevalence in the population of suspected impaired drivers. The degree of impairment depends on different factors, including pharmacokinetic properties of the drug and pharmacodynamic aspects. More research is needed to study the prevalence of all prescribed driving impairing medicines and to investigate if providing additional information to medicinal drug users on driving impairing medicines would lower the prevalence of medicinal drug positive drivers.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查在荷兰怀疑受到药物和非法药物影响而驾驶的驾驶员中精神药物的流行情况,并比较选定的有障碍药物的流行程度和这些药物在荷兰普通人群中的流行情况。在2009年1月至2012年12月之间,总共对3038例荷兰可疑受损驾驶员的血液样本进行了分析,以确定其中是否存在药物和非法药物。在94%(2842/3038)的病例中,发现了药物和/或非法药物。在33%的血液样本中发现了药物,抗焦虑药的患病率最高。在86%的案件中,获得了非法药物阳性结果,大麻的患病率最高。至少在56%的血液样本中确定了多药用途,包括药用和/或非法药物。对于包括抗焦虑药和催眠药在内的组合,发现使用多药的患病率最高。通常,由于荷兰人中第一个人群的选择偏见较高,因此在可疑的驾驶员中驾驶有障碍药物的患病率高于在荷兰总人口中使用这些药物的患病率。两种人群之间的差异可以通过使用的方法学方法(例如分析结果的分类标准,样品选择偏差)和某些药物的滥用(例如地西epa)来解释。药物对驾驶性能的负面影响在很大程度上决定了可疑受损驾驶员人群中的患病率。损伤程度取决于不同因素,包括药物的药代动力学特性和药效学方面。需要做更多的研究来研究所有处方驾驶障碍药物的患病率,并调查是否向药物滥用者提供有关驾驶障碍药物的附加信息是否会降低药物阳性驾驶员的患病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号