首页> 外文期刊>Gynecologic Oncology: An International Journal >A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients.
【24h】

A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients.

机译:对子宫内膜癌行机器人子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫内膜切除术与淋巴结清扫术的学习曲线和手术结果进行比较详细的分析:对前一百二十二例患者的病例对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

GOAL: To determine the learning curve and surgical outcome for the first one hundred twenty-two robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy patients in comparison to the first one hundred twenty-two patients who underwent the same procedure laparoscopically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis of the first 122 patients who underwent a robotic assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy (RHBPPALND) was compared to the first 122 patients who underwent a total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy (LHBPPALND). The learning curve of the surgical procedure was determined by measuring operative time with respect to chronological order of each patient who had undergone their respective procedure. Number of lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, days of hospitalization, and complications of all patients were also analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The learning curve of the surgical procedure was determined by measuring operative time with respect to chronological order of each patient who had undergone their respective procedure. Data were analyzed for mean age, body mass index, operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node retrieval and complications for both surgical procedures. The mean operative time was 147.2+/-48.2 and 186.8+/-59.8 for RHBPPALND and LHBPPALND respectively. The mean EBL was statistically significant at 81.1+/-45.9 and 207.4+/-109.4 for RHBPPALND and LHBPPALND respectively. The total number of pelvic and aortic lymph nodes was 25.1+/-12.7 for RHBPPALND and 43.1+/-17.8 for LHBPPALND. The number of pelvic lymph node was 19.2+/-9.0 and 24.7+/-11.9 for RHBPPALND and LHBPPALND. The days of hospitalization of RHBPPALND and LHBPPALND were 1.5+/-0.9 and 3.2+/-2.3. The number of intraoperative complications for RHBPPALND, and LHBPPALND was 1 and 7, respectively. CONCLUSION: Robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy has a faster learning curve in comparison to laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy. The adequacy of surgical staging was comparable between the two surgical methods. RHBPPALND is associated with shorter hospitalization, less blood loss and less intraoperative and major complications, and lower rate of conversion to open procedure.
机译:目标:确定第一批122例行淋巴结清扫术的机器人子宫切除术与首批接受相同腹腔镜手术的一百二十二例患者的学习曲线和手术结果。材料与方法:将前122例行机器人辅助子宫切除术并进行淋巴结清扫术(RHBPPALND)的患者与前122例行腹腔镜子宫切除术并进行淋巴结清扫术(LHBPPALND)的患者进行比较。手术过程的学习曲线是通过测量每个接受过各自手术的患者的时间顺序来确定的。还对所有患者的淋巴结数目,估计的失血量,住院天数和并发症进行了分析和比较。结果:外科手术的学习曲线是通过根据每个接受过各自手术的患者的时间顺序测量手术时间来确定的。分析了两种手术方法的平均年龄,体重指数,手术时间,估计失血量,淋巴结恢复和并发症的数据。 RHBPPALND和LHBPPALND的平均手术时间分别为147.2 +/- 48.2和186.8 +/- 59.8。 RHBPPALND和LHBPPALND的平均EBL分别为81.1 +/- 45.9和207.4 +/- 109.4,具有统计学意义。 RHBPPALND的盆腔和主动脉淋巴结总数为25.1 +/- 12.7,LHBPPALND的总数为43.1 +/- 17.8。 RHBPPALND和LHBPPALND的盆腔淋巴结数目分别为19.2 +/- 9.0和24.7 +/- 11.9。 RHBPPALND和LHBPPALND的住院天数分别为1.5 +/- 0.9和3.2 +/- 2.3。 RHBPPALND和LHBPPALND的术中并发症分别为1和7。结论:相比于腹腔镜子宫淋巴结清扫术,机器人子宫切除术与淋巴结清扫术具有更快的学习曲线。在两种手术方法之间,手术分期的适当性相当。 RHBPPALND与住院时间短,失血量少,术中和主要并发症少,转换为开放手术的发生率低有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号