...
首页> 外文期刊>Food Economics >Inputs use in the agriculture of Emilia-Romagna: Farm comparison through the total factor productivity approach
【24h】

Inputs use in the agriculture of Emilia-Romagna: Farm comparison through the total factor productivity approach

机译:艾米利亚—罗马涅农业中的投入物使用:通过全要素生产率方法进行农场比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to measure agriculture sustainability, the efficient use of inputs becomes a crucial issue. In this perspective, the analysts concentrate their attention on the total factor productivity index (TFP). In this view, Lynam and Herdt proposed theTFP as a suitable assessment of the sustainability of single crops, of cropping systems or of farming systems. Even if the TFP does not take into account the non-market output (social and environmental aspects), it is possible to argue that a negative trend of TFP represents a resource degradation if related to the generated outputs. On the other hand, the non-negative trend of TFP represents a fitting measure of a sustainable agricultural system and of an efficient use of the resources. The aim of thepaper is to analyze the productivity in the use of external factors in different types of farming at the Emilia-Romagna Region level, that is specialist field crops, specialist permanent crops and specialist milk production farms. A significant number of indexing procedures is accessible to evaluate the efficiency in converting inputs into outputs. In this paper, the TFP is estimated through an indirect evaluation of the quantity index of outputs and inputs of each farming system taken into account inthe analysis. Purposely, the amount of the total sales is considered as a measure of the output, whereas intermediate consumption are considered as a measure of the inputs to evaluate the productivity of external factors (PEF). The value of chemicals andthe value of fodders and supplements was considered in order to compute the productivity of these specifics inputs. Data, referring to the period 2000-2009, are collected from the farm accountancy data network of the Emilia-Romagna Region DG Agriculture. The study highlights how the PEF measured through the TFP approach seems to be an effective way to evaluate the sustainability of the use of agricultural resources. Even if the limit of this approach comes from the complexity in understanding the realin depth causes of the productivity changing (e.g. technical efficiency, scale efficiency), the use of number index to evaluate the TFP seems to be simple and fitting for a first exploratory investigation.
机译:为了衡量农业的可持续性,有效利用投入成为关键问题。从这个角度来看,分析师将注意力集中在全要素生产率指数(TFP)上。按照这种观点,Lynam和Herdt提出了TFP,作为对单一作物,种植系统或耕作系统可持续性的适当评估。即使全要素生产率没有考虑非市场产出(社会和环境方面),也有可能认为全要素生产率的负面趋势如果与所产生的产出有关,则表示资源退化。另一方面,全要素生产率的非负趋势代表了可持续农业系统和资源有效利用的一种适当措施。本文的目的是分析艾米利亚—罗马涅大区一级不同耕种方式(即专业田间作物,专业永久作物和专业牛奶生产农场)在利用外部因素时的生产率。可以使用大量索引程序来评估将输入转换为输出的效率。本文通过对评估中考虑到的每个农业系统的产出和投入的数量指数的间接评估来估算全要素生产率。故意地,将总销售量视为产出的量度,而将中间消耗视为投入量的量度,以评估外部因素的生产率(PEF)。考虑了化学品的价值以及饲料和补品的价值,以便计算这些具体投入的生产率。 2000-2009年的数据是从艾米利亚—罗马涅大区农业总局的农业会计数据网络中收集的。该研究强调了通过全要素生产率方法测得的PEF似乎是评估农业资源利用可持续性的有效方法。即使此方法的局限性在于了解生产率变化的实际深度原因的复杂性(例如技术效率,规模效率),但使用数字指数评估TFP似乎很简单,适合首次探索性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号