...
首页> 外文期刊>Food Quality and Preference >Internal versus external preference analysis: An exploratory study on end-user evaluation.
【24h】

Internal versus external preference analysis: An exploratory study on end-user evaluation.

机译:内部与外部偏好分析:有关最终用户评估的探索性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Internal and external preference analysis emphasise fundamentally different perspectives on the same data. We extend the literature on comparisons between internal and external preference analysis by incorporating the perspective of the end user of the preference analysis results. From a conceptual analysis of the methodological similarities and differences between these two techniques, we develop and implement a framework for end-user evaluation of preference analysis output in terms of perceived actionability for food technology, marketing and creative purposes as well as comprehensibility and perceived appropriateness at the marketing-R&D interface. Overall, this exploratory study suggests that end-users find information from external analysis more actionable for food technological tasks. Internal preference analysis holds a clear advantage on marketing actionability and new product creativity. No preference technique holds a clear advantage on marketing-R&D interface appropriateness and comprehensibility. Rather than recommending applying both techniques, we suggest several ways forward in better exploiting the synergy between these two approaches. All rights reserved, Elsevier.
机译:内部和外部偏好分析强调对同一数据的根本不同观点。通过结合偏好分析结果的最终用户的观点,我们扩展了内部和外部偏好分析之间比较的文献。通过对这两种技术在方法上的相似性和区别的概念分析,我们开发并实施了一个最终用户评估偏爱分析输出的框架,该框架根据人们对食品技术,市场营销和创新目的的可操作性以及可理解性和适当性进行评估在市场营销研发界面。总的来说,这项探索性研究表明,最终用户从外部分析中发现的信息对于食品技术任务更具实用性。内部偏好分析在营销可操作性和新产品创意方面拥有明显的优势。没有一种偏好技术在营销-研发接口的适当性和可理解性上拥有明显的优势。除了建议同时使用这两种技术外,我们还建议了几种方法,以更好地利用这两种方法之间的协同作用。保留所有权利,Elsevier。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号