...
首页> 外文期刊>Food Quality and Preference >Rapid descriptive sensory methods. Comparison of Free Multiple Sorting, Partial Napping, Napping, Flash Profiling and conventional profiling.
【24h】

Rapid descriptive sensory methods. Comparison of Free Multiple Sorting, Partial Napping, Napping, Flash Profiling and conventional profiling.

机译:快速的描述性感觉方法。自由多重排序,部分小睡,小睡,Flash分析和常规分析的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two new rapid descriptive sensory evaluation methods are introduced to the field of food sensory evaluation. The first method, free multiple sorting, allows subjects to perform ad libitum free sortings, until they feel that no more relevant dissimilarities among products remain. The second method is a modal restriction of Napping to specific sensory modalities, directing sensation and still allowing a holistic approach to products. The new methods are compared to Flash Profiling, Napping and conventional descriptive sensory profiling. Evaluations are performed by several panels of expert assessors originating from two distinct research environments. Evaluations are performed on the same nine pate products and within the same period of time. Results are analysed configurationally (graphically) as well as with RV coefficients, semantically and practically. Parametric bootstrapped confidence ellipses are applied for the graphical validation and comparisons. This allows similar comparisons and is applicable to single-block evaluation designs such as Napping. The partial Napping allows repetitions on multiple sensory modalities, e.g. appearance, taste and mouthfeel, and shows the average of these repetitions to be significantly more closely related to the conventional profile than other methods. Semantic comparison shows large differences, with closest relations found between the two conventional profiles. This suggests that semantic results from an assessor in an evaluation type with no training sessions are dependent on the assessors' personal semantic skills. Comparisons of the methods' practical differences highlight the time advantage of the rapid approaches and their individual differences in the number of attributes generated
机译:两种新的快速描述性感官评估方法被引入到食品感官评估领域。第一种方法是自由多重排序,使主体可以自由进行自由排序,直到他们觉得产品之间不再存在相关的相似性为止。第二种方法是将小睡限制在特定的感觉模态上,并将其引导到感觉上,并且仍然允许对产品进行整体处理。将新方法与Flash分析,小睡和常规描述性感觉分析进行了比较。评估由来自两个不同研究环境的几个专家评估员小组执行。在相同的时间段内对相同的九种酱产品进行评估。从语义和实践上对结果进行配置(图形)分析,并使用RV系数进行分析。参数自举置信椭圆适用于图形验证和比较。这样可以进行类似的比较,并且适用于单块评估设计,例如Napping。局部小睡允许在多种感觉模态上重复,例如。外观,味道和口感,并且显示这些重复次数的平均值与其他方法相比,与常规曲线的关系更为密切。语义比较显示出很大的差异,在两个常规配置文件之间发现了最紧密的关系。这表明评估者在没有培训的情况下以评估类型获得的语义结果取决于评估者的个人语义技能。方法的实际差异的比较突出了快速方法的时间优势及其在生成的属性数量上的个体差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号