首页> 外文期刊>Food Control >Sponge versus mini-roller for the surface microbiological control of Listeria monocytogenes, total aerobic mesophiles and Enterobacteriaceae in the meat industry.
【24h】

Sponge versus mini-roller for the surface microbiological control of Listeria monocytogenes, total aerobic mesophiles and Enterobacteriaceae in the meat industry.

机译:海绵与微型滚筒在肉类工业中用于单核细胞增生李斯特菌,总需氧嗜温菌和肠杆菌科的表面微生物控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Equipment and surfaces in food industries have a highly variable microbial load and they can be a source of Listeria monocytogenes, which is a pathogen capable of forming biofilms increasing the risk of food contamination. In the present study we have evaluated and compared the efficacy of two environmental sampling procedures, the classical cellulose sponge and a novel procedure, the wool fiber mini-roller. First, two stainless steel surfaces and a polyethylene cutting board were inoculated in the laboratory with four strains of L. monocytogenes isolated from meat products. The recovery percentage of L. monocytogenes varied between 0.17% and 5.83%, and the mini-roller showed higher recoveries than the sponge in the stainless steel surfaces, while the sponge performed better in the polyethylene cutting board. The second part of the study was carried out in 26 meat industries where 69 food contact surfaces were sampled for L. monocytogenes, total aerobic mesophiles and Enterobacteriaceae. Overall, 31.9% sampling points tested positive for L. monocytogenes with the sponge as compared to 26.1% that showed positive with the mini-roller. The mean aerobic counts with the sponge (3.76 log cfu/cm2) were very similar to those obtained with the mini-roller (3.71 log cfu/cm2), and the Enterobacteriaceae counts were somewhat higher with the mini-roller (0.52 log cfu/cm2) than with the sponge (0.07 log cfu/cm2), but the differences were not significant in either case. Results of this study suggest that the novel mini-roller constitutes a sampling procedure which is convenient to apply on surfaces, is cost-effective, and yields equal recoveries of L. monocytogenes, aerobic mesophiles and Enterobacteriaceae than does the classical sponge, and thus could be used for the monitoring of these microbial groups in food contact surfaces
机译:食品工业中的设备和表面的微生物负荷变化很大,它们可能是单核细胞增生李斯特菌的来源,而李斯特菌是一种能够形成生物膜的病原体,会增加食品污染的风险。在本研究中,我们评估并比较了两种环境采样程序(经典的纤维素海绵和一种新颖的程序,羊毛纤维迷你辊)的功效。首先,在实验室中用从肉制品中分离出的四种菌株单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌接种两个不锈钢表面和一个聚乙烯切菜板。 L的回收率。单核细胞增生病的变化范围在0.17%至5.83%之间,微型滚筒在不锈钢表面的回收率高于海绵,而在聚乙烯切菜板上的海绵表现更好。研究的第二部分是在26个肉类工业中进行的,其中对69个食品接触面进行了iL采样。单核细胞增生,总有氧嗜温菌和肠杆菌科。总体而言,使用海绵对3种单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌检测为阳性的采样点为31.9%,而对迷你滚筒检测​​为阳性的采样点为26.1%。海绵的平均需氧量(3.76 log cfu / cm 2 )与迷你滚筒的平均需氧量(3.71 log cfu / cm 2 )非常相似,并且迷你辊的肠杆菌科计数(0.52 log cfu / cm 2 )高于海绵(0.07 log cfu / cm 2 ),但两种情况下的差异均不显着。这项研究的结果表明,该新型迷你辊构成了一种采样程序,该采样程序便于在表面上使用,具有成本效益,并且产生相等的L回收率。单核细胞增生,好氧嗜温菌和肠杆菌科比传统海绵要好,因此可用于监测食品接触表面中的这些微生物群

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号