首页> 外文期刊>Food Australia >Health claims and food advertising: comparison of marketing and nutrition experts' ratings of magazine advertisements.
【24h】

Health claims and food advertising: comparison of marketing and nutrition experts' ratings of magazine advertisements.

机译:健康声明和食品广告:比较市场营销人员和营养专家对杂志广告的评分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To determine the nature and differences in expert opinion from the fields of nutrition and marketing on the use of health claims in the 30 most frequently appearing Australian magazine food advertisements, a survey was conducted with 28 nutritionists and 21 marketing experts in Australia and New Zealand. The experts assessed the advertisements with respect to the accuracy of the nutrition claims, the tactics and intentions of the advertising strategy and the accessibility of the nutrition information to lay consumers. Of 28 advertisements where a claim was identified, for only one did more than 90% believe the claim to be accurate. Nutritionists were more likely than marketers to perceive that the target audience would identify with the advertisement, and nutritionists more likely to perceive that the target audience would believe and misunderstand the nutritional information provided. This research showed that experts in both nutrition and marketing perceive that there is considerable potential for food advertising to mislead consumers.
机译:为了确定营养和营销领域专家意见在30种最常出现的澳大利亚杂志食品广告中使用健康声称的性质和差异,对澳大利亚和新西兰的28名营养学家和21名营销专家进行了调查。专家们根据营养声称的准确性,广告策略的策略和意图以及营养信息对非专业消费者的可访问性评估了广告。在28个广告中,找到索赔的广告中,只有90%的广告确实认为索赔是正确的。营养学家比营销者更容易意识到目标受众会识别广告,营养学家更容易意识到目标受众会相信并误解所提供的营养信息。这项研究表明,营养和市场营销专家都认为,食品广告有很大的潜力误导消费者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号