...
首页> 外文期刊>Food and Nutrition Bulletin >Still waiting for Godot? Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies.
【24h】

Still waiting for Godot? Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies.

机译:还在等待戈多吗?改善家庭消费和支出调查(HCES),以实现更多基于证据的营养政策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. The constrained evidence base of food and nutrition policy-making compromises nutrition programs. Nutrition policy-making must do better than relying exclusively on Food and Agriculture Organization Food Balance Sheets. The strategy of relying on observed-weighed food record or 24-hour recall surveys has not proven practical either; they remain few in number, generally not nationally representative, and of dubious external validity. Although Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) have shortcomings, they are increasingly being used to address this information gap. Objective. To promote dialog within the nutrition community, and between it and the greater community of HCES stakeholders, in order to identify their shared agenda and develop a strategy to improve HCES for analyzing food and nutrition issues. Methods. The diverse origins and objectives of HCES are described, the evolution of their use in addressing food and nutrition issues is traced, and their shortcomings are identified. Results. The causes, relative importance, some potential solutions, and the strategic implications of three distinct categories of shortcomings are discussed. Elements of a possible approach and process for strengthening the surveys are outlined, including identifying best practices, developing guidelines and more rigorously analyzing the tradeoffs involved in common, key survey design and implementation decisions. Conclusions. To date, the nutrition community's role in most HCES has been as a passive user of secondary data. The nutrition community must become more involved in the design, implementation, and analysis of HCES by identifying criteria for prioritizing countries, establishing assessment criteria, applying the criteria in retrospective assessments, identifying key shortcomings, and recommending alternatives to ameliorate the short-comings. Several trends suggest that this is a propitious time for improving the relevance and reliability of HCES.
机译:背景。粮食和营养政策制定的证据不足,不利于营养计划。营养决策必须比仅仅依靠粮食及农业组织粮食资产负债表做得更好。事实证明,依靠观察称量的食物记录或24小时召回调查的策略也不可行。它们的数量仍然很少,通常不具有全国代表性,并且具有外部可疑性。尽管家庭消费和支出调查(HCES)有缺点,但越来越多的家庭将其用于解决这一信息缺口。目的。在营养界内部以及在与HCES利益相关者的更大社区之间促进对话,以便确定他们的共同议程并制定战略以改善HCES,以分析食物和营养问题。方法。描述了HCES的不同起源和目标,追踪了它们在解决食品和营养问题中的用途演变,并指出了它们的缺点。结果。讨论了三种不同类别缺点的原因,相对重要性,一些可能的解决方案以及战略意义。概述了加强调查的可能方法和过程的要素,包括确定最佳实践,制定指南以及更严格地分析共同的关键调查设计和实施决策所涉及的权衡。结论迄今为止,营养界在大多数HCES中的角色一直是二手数据的被动用户。营养界必须通过确定优先国家的标准,建立评估标准,在回顾性评估中应用这些标准,确定主要缺点并推荐替代方案来改善缺点,从而更多地参与HCES的设计,实施和分析。一些趋势表明,这是改善HCES相关性和可靠性的有利时机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号