首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of occupational therapy: Revue Canadienne d'Ergotherapie >Evidence-based practice behaviours: A comparison amongst occupational therapy students and clinicians
【24h】

Evidence-based practice behaviours: A comparison amongst occupational therapy students and clinicians

机译:循证实践行为:职业治疗学生和临床医生之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Occupational therapy graduates are expected to demonstrate entrylevel competencies in evidence-based practice. To support students during the course of professional education in developing the knowledge, skills, and attitudes for integrating scientific findings into clinical practice, educators must identify the process by which these competencies are developed. Purpose: To identify the differences in evidence-based practice decisions amongst occupational therapy students and experienced clinicians. Methods: Using a vignette depicting an older client with a history of falls, participants' evidence-based practice decisions were compared to a reference model. Results: In the initial steps of the process, knowledge of evidence-based practice concepts appeared to be dependent upon formal instruction, whereas expert-like behaviours in the integration of evidence for decision-making seemed to be a function of clinical experience. Implications: Academic and clinical educators can use identified gaps in knowledge and synthesis of concepts to update the evidence-based practice content in occupational therapy curricula and fieldwork.
机译:背景:职业治疗专业的毕业生应在基于证据的实践中表现出入门级的能力。为了在专业教育过程中支持学生发展将科学发现整合到临床实践中的知识,技能和态度,教育工作者必须确定培养这些能力的过程。目的:确定职业治疗学生和经验丰富的临床医生在循证实践决策中的差异。方法:使用描绘有跌倒历史的老客户的小插图,将参与者基于证据的实践决策与参考模型进行比较。结果:在该过程的初始步骤中,基于证据的实践概念的知识似乎依赖于正式的指导,而在将证据整合到决策中时像专家一样的行为似乎是临床经验的函数。启示:学术和临床教育者可以利用已发现的知识空白和概念综合来更新职业治疗课程和实地调查中循证实践的内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号