【24h】

Bilateral oophorectomy is not associated with increased mortality: The California Teachers Study

机译:双侧卵巢切除术与死亡率增加无关:加州教师研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To investigate the effect of surgical menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy on mortality, in light of evidence that bilateral oophorectomy among premenopausal women rapidly reduces endogenous hormone levels, thereby modifying risks of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer. Design: The California Teachers Study (CTS) is a prospective cohort study of 133,479 women initiated in 1995-1996 through a mailed, self-administered questionnaire. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Setting: None. Patient(s): California Teachers Study participants who, at baseline, reported having surgical menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy (n = 9,785), were compared with participants with natural menopause (n = 32,219). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): We investigated whether bilateral oophorectomy was associated with all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality, overall and by menopausal hormone therapy use status. Result(s): Among participants aged <45 years at menopause, multivariable relative risks were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-1.00), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.66-1.11), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.67-1.23) for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cancer mortality, respectively. Among participants with an age at menopause of ≥45 years, multivariable relative risks were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.94), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.96), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72-0.98) for all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality, respectively. The association between bilateral oophorectomy and mortality did not differ by baseline status of hormone therapy use. Conclusion(s): Surgical menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy vs. natural menopause does not increase all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality.
机译:目的:探讨双侧卵巢切除术导致的手术绝经对死亡率的影响,有证据表明绝经前女性双侧卵巢切除术会迅速降低内源激素水平,从而改变罹患心血管疾病和乳腺癌的风险。设计:加利福尼亚教师研究(CTS)是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是1995年至1996年间通过邮寄的自我管理问卷调查的133,479名妇女。使用Cox比例风险回归估算相对风险和95%置信区间(CI)。设置:无。患者:在基线时报告因双侧卵巢切除术而手术绝经的加利福尼亚州教师研究参与者(n = 9,785),与自然绝经的参与者(n = 32,219)进行了比较。干预措施:无。主要结果指标:我们调查了总体和绝经激素治疗使用状况,双侧卵巢切除术是否与全因,心血管或癌症死亡率相关。结果:绝经年龄<45岁的参与者中,多变量相对风险分别为0.86(95%CI,0.74-1.00),0.85(95%CI,0.66-1.11)和0.91(95%CI,0.67-1.23) )分别用于全因死亡率,心血管疾病死亡率和癌症死亡率。在更年期≥45岁的参与者中,多变量相对危险度分别为0.87(95%CI,0.80-0.94),0.83(95%CI,0.71-0.96)和0.84(95%CI,0.72-0.98)。全因,心血管和癌症死亡率。双侧卵巢切除术与死亡率之间的关联因激素治疗使用的基线状况而无差异。结论:双侧卵巢切除术与自然绝经相比,手术绝经不会增加全因,心血管或癌症的死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号