首页> 外文期刊>FEMS Microbiology Letters >Comparison of colonization dynamics and pathology of mice infected with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, enterohaemorrhagic E-coli and Citrobacter rodentium
【24h】

Comparison of colonization dynamics and pathology of mice infected with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, enterohaemorrhagic E-coli and Citrobacter rodentium

机译:肠道致病性大肠杆菌,肠出血性大肠杆菌和啮齿类柠檬酸杆菌感染小鼠的定殖动力学和病理学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and Citrobacter rodentium (CR) colonize the gastrointestinal tract epithelium via attaching and effacing lesions. While humans are believed to be the only living reservoir of typical EPEC and EHEC to have border host specificity, CR is a restricted mouse pathogen. Recently, conflicting conclusions were reported concerning the utility of a murine model to study mechanisms of EPEC and EHEC colonization and infection. We therefore aimed to compare colonization dynamics of EPEC, EHEC and CR, together with a commensal E. coli (Nissle) as a control, in the murine. We show that all strains are equally shed in stools over the first 48 h post inoculation. However, while the CR population then rapidly expanded the EPEC, EHEC and Nissle populations quickly declined to a level just above detection. We conclude that following oral inoculation EPEC and EHEC develop a commensal, rather than pathogenic, interaction within the mouse host.
机译:肠致病性大肠埃希氏菌(EPEC),肠出血性大肠埃希氏菌(EHEC)和啮齿类柠檬酸杆菌(CR)通过附着和脱落的病灶定居在胃肠道上皮中。虽然人们认为人类是典型的具有边缘宿主特异性的EPEC和EHEC的唯一存活库,但CR是受限制的小鼠病原体。近来,关于使用鼠模型研究EPEC和EHEC定植和感染机制的效用,得出了相互矛盾的结论。因此,我们旨在比较EPEC,EHEC和CR以及定型大肠杆菌(Nissle)在小鼠中的定殖动态。我们显示,在接种后的第一个48小时内,所有菌株在粪便中均等脱落。但是,尽管CR人口随后迅速扩大了EPEC,但EHEC和Nissle人口迅速下降到略高于检测水平。我们得出的结论是,口服接种后,EPEC和EHEC在小鼠宿主内发展了共生而非致病性相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号