首页> 外文期刊>Farm Management Notes >Institutional linkages for farming systems development
【24h】

Institutional linkages for farming systems development

机译:农业系统发展的机构联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Within the agricultural sector, growth has been uneven. As most productivity gains have been concentrated in irrigated crops, many planners are giving increased attention to rainfed areas to seek new avenues for growth and to tackle, simultaneously, poverty and resource degradation. Furthermore, in many countries a general reorientation towards system approaches to rural development is apparent; and towards bottom-up models emphasizing farmer participation. There is thus increased support for diversified farming systems, balanced input use, gender analyses, partnerships of Government agencies, NGOs and private sector, and linkage among research, support service and policy advisory institutions. Because the FSD approach is founded on the principles of multidisciplinarity and participation, it automatically faces issues of integration and institutional linkage. Although FSD impact depends critically upon the effectiveness of institutional linkages, these have received much less attention than the techniques of FSD per se. As these linkages are numerous and diverse, an analytical framework is proposed, Two linkages areas are discussed in depth: the well known area of research-extension-farmer linkages, and the less common farming systems-policy linkage.
机译:在农业部门内,增长不平衡。由于大多数生产率的提高都集中在灌溉作物上,因此许多计划者越来越重视雨育地区,以寻求新的增长途径,同时解决贫困和资源退化问题。此外,在许多国家中,很明显已经普遍转向农村发展的系统方法。并采用强调农民参与的自下而上的模式。因此,对多样化的耕作制度,平衡的投入使用,性别分析,政府机构,非政府组织和私营部门的伙伴关系以及研究,支持服务和政策咨询机构之间的联系的支持增加了。由于FSD方法是建立在多学科性和参与性原则的基础上的,因此它会自动面临整合和机构联系的问题。尽管FSD的影响在很大程度上取决于机构联系的有效性,但与FSD本身的技术相比,它们受到的关注要少得多。由于这些联系众多且多样,因此提出了一个分析框架。对两个联系领域进行了深入讨论:众所周知的研究-扩展-农民联系领域,以及较不常见的耕作制度-政策联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号