首页> 外文期刊>Family practice. >Blood pressure target attainment in the background of guidelines: The very elderly in swiss primary care
【24h】

Blood pressure target attainment in the background of guidelines: The very elderly in swiss primary care

机译:指南背景下的血压目标达成情况:瑞士初级保健中的老年人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: There are only a few trials for the very elderly population (>79 years). No consensus, which blood pressure (BP) goals and substances should be applied, has been found yet. This survey was undertaken to investigate how octogenarians are treated and attain BP targets in the Swiss primary care. Methods: Data from 4594 hypertensive patients were collected within 7 days. Eight hundred and seventy-seven patients met the requirement to be >79 years. We assessed substances/combinations and investigated pulse pressure and target blood pressure attainment (TBPA) using three different recommendations [Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP), Swiss Society of Hypertension (SSH), European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology (ESH-ESC)]. Secondarily, we compared TBPA attained by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/diuretic (D), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/D and calcium channel blocker (CCB)/D with any other dual therapy and investigated whether Ds/beta-blockers (BBs) or Ds/renin angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (RAAS-Is) lead to higher TBPA. Finally, we assessed the impact of drug administration, practical work experience, location and specialization of GPs on TBPA. Results: Octogenarians attained target blood pressure (TBP) between 44% (ESH-ESC) and 74% (SSH). Optimalormal BP was reached in 22.8% of patients. Pulse pressure <65 mmHg was shown in 66.4% of patients. Monotherapy was most commonly applied followed by dual single-pill combination with ARB/D (46.5%) or ACEI/D (36.0%). No benefit in TBPA was found comparing a RAASI/D and CCB/D treatment with any other dual combination. There was also no difference between BB/D and RAAS-I/D combination therapy and between single-pill combination and dual free combinations. Conclusions: GPs adhere to the use of substances proven in outcome trials and attain high TBP. No difference in meeting BP goals could be found using different drug classes. There is an unmet need to harmonize recommendations and to add additional information for the treatment of octogenarians.
机译:背景:只有极少数老年人(> 79岁)的试验。尚未达成共识,即应采用哪些血压目标和物质。这项调查旨在调查在瑞士的初级保健中如何治疗高龄者并达到BP目标。方法:在7天内收集了4594例高血压患者的数据。 877名患者满足了> 79岁的要求。我们使用三种不同的建议[加拿大高血压教育计划(CHEP),瑞士高血压学会(SSH),欧洲高血压学会-欧洲心脏病学会(ESH-),对物质/组合进行了评估,并研究了脉压和目标血压达到(TBPA)退出)]。其次,我们将血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)/利尿剂(D),血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)/ D和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)/ D与任何其他双重疗法所获得的TBPA进行了比较,并研究了Ds /β-阻断剂(BBs)或Ds /肾素血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂(RAAS-Is)导致更高的TBPA。最后,我们评估了药物管理,实际工作经验,全科医生的位置和专业化对TBPA的影响。结果:八面体患者的目标血压(TBP)在44%(ESH-ESC)和74%(SSH)之间。 22.8%的患者达到了最佳/正常血压。 66.4%的患者显示脉压<65 mmHg。最常用的方法是单药疗法,然后与ARB / D(46.5%)或ACEI / D(36.0%)双重单药合用。将RAASI / D和CCB / D处理与任何其他双重组合进行比较,未发现TBPA有任何益处。 BB / D和RAAS-I / D联合疗法之间以及单药组合和双重自由组合之间也没有差异。结论:GP坚持使用在结果试验中证明的药物并获得较高的TBP。使用不同的药物类别,在达到BP目标方面没有差异。协调建议并增加其他信息以治疗八岁老人的需求尚未得到满足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号