首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Letter to the Editors:Clinical pharmacology - a sleeping beauty?
【24h】

Letter to the Editors:Clinical pharmacology - a sleeping beauty?

机译:致编辑的信:临床药理学-睡美人吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a recent comment in the Lancet by Maxwell and Webb, the authors depict an unenviable state and predict a gloomy future for British clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) . We read their paper with interest and affection, as CPT in Croatia has been organized according to the model instituted in the UK, a fact that also makes the emerging difficulties of potential concern to us. After analysing the points raised by the authors, we would like to share some of our own views and ideas, in an attempt to seek possible solutions. It seems that by adhering to its academic roots and opening a space for others, CPT has missed a valuable opportunity to demonstrate its importance and practicality to national healthcare services . Unfortunately, the increasing focus on performance targets is not unique to the health service in the UK. Such practices cause problems to Croatian CPT as well, making clinical pharmacologists appear less relevant to health authorities. We therefore suggest developing a list of evaluation criteria in CPT that could be utilized for specialist assessment and continuing education in this field
机译:在麦克斯韦和韦伯发表在《柳叶刀》杂志上的最新评论中,作者描述了一种令人羡慕的状态,并预测了英国临床药理学和治疗学(CPT)的前景黯淡。我们阅读他们的论文时充满了兴趣和深情,因为克罗地亚的CPT是根据英国制定的模式组织的,这一事实也使我们面临着新的潜在困难。在分析了作者提出的观点之后,我们想分享一些自己的观点和想法,以寻求可能的解决方案。看起来,CPT秉承其学术基础并为他人开放空间,却错过了一个宝贵的机会,以证明其对国家医疗保健服务的重要性和实用性。不幸的是,越来越多地关注绩效目标并不是英国的卫生服务所独有的。这种做法也给克罗地亚的CPT造成了问题,使临床药理学家显得与卫生当局的关系不大。因此,我们建议在CPT中制定评估标准清单,以用于该领域的专家评估和继续教育

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号