首页> 外文期刊>Bioinformatics >A comparison of statistical methods for analysis of high density oligonucleotide array data
【24h】

A comparison of statistical methods for analysis of high density oligonucleotide array data

机译:比较高密度寡核苷酸阵列数据的统计方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Motivation: Gene expression profiling has become an invaluable tool in functional genomics. A wide variety of statistical methods have been employed to analyze the data generated in experiments using Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays. It is important to understand the relative performance of these methods in terms of accuracy in detecting and quantifying relative gene expression levels and changes in gene expression. Results: Three different analysis approaches have been compared in this work: non-parametric statistical methods implemented in Affymetrix Microarray Analysis Suite v5.0 (MAS5); an error-modeling based approach implemented in Rosetta Resolver v3.1; and an intensity-modeling approach implemented in dChip v1.1. A Latin Square data set generated and made available by Affymetrix was used in the comparison. All three methods-Resolver, MAS5 and the version of dChip based on the difference between perfect match and mismatch intensities-perform well in quantifying gene expression. Presence calls made by MAS5 and Resolver perform well at high concentrations, but they cannot be relied upon at low concentrations. The performance of Resolver and MAS5 in detecting 2-fold changes in transcript concentration is superior to that of dChip. At a comparable false positive rate, Resolver and MAS5 are able to detect many more true changes in transcript concentration. Estimated fold changes calculated by all the methods are biased below the true values.
机译:动机:基因表达谱分析已成为功能基因组学中的宝贵工具。已使用多种统计方法来分析使用Affymetrix GeneChip微阵列在实验中生成的数据。从检测和定量相对基因表达水平和基因表达变化的准确性方面,了解这些方法的相对性能非常重要。结果:在这项工作中比较了三种不同的分析方法:Affymetrix Microarray Analysis Suite v5.0(MAS5)中实施的非参数统计方法; Rosetta Resolver v3.1中实现的基于错误建模的方法;以及在dChip v1.1中实现的强度建模方法。比较中使用了由Affymetrix生成并提供的Latin Square数据集。基于完全匹​​配和不匹配强度之间差异的所有三种方法(Resolver,MAS5和dChip版本)在定量基因表达方面表现良好。 MAS5和Resolver进行的状态呼叫在高浓度下表现良好,但在低浓度下不能依靠它们。 Resolver和MAS5在检测转录浓度2倍变化方面的性能优于dChip。以相当的假阳性率,Resolver和MAS5能够检测出转录本浓度的更多真实变化。所有方法计算出的估计倍数变化均低于真实值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号