...
首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences >Can a bog drained for forestry be a stronger carbon sink than a natural bog forest?
【24h】

Can a bog drained for forestry be a stronger carbon sink than a natural bog forest?

机译:排干林业的沼泽能比天然沼泽森林更强大的碳汇吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compares the CO_2 exchange of a natural bog forest, and of a bog drained for forestry in the pre-Alpine region of southern Germany. The sites are separated by only 10 km, they share the same soil formation history and are exposed to the same climate and weather conditions. In contrast, they differ in land use history: at the Schechenfilz site a natural bog-pine forest (Pinus mugo ssp. rotundata) grows on an undisturbed, about 5m thick peat layer; at Mooseurach a planted spruce forest (Picea abies) grows on drained and degraded peat (3.4 m). The net ecosystem exchange of CO_2 (NEE) at both sites has been investigated for 2 years (July 2010-June 2012), using the eddy covariance technique. Our results indicate that the drained, forested bog at Mooseurach is a much stronger carbon dioxide sink (-130±31 and -300±66 gCm~(-2) a~(-1) in the first and second year, respectively) than the natural bog forest at Schechenfilz (-53±28 and -73±38 gCm~(-2) a~(-1)). The strong net CO_2 uptake can be explained by the high gross primary productivity of the 44-year old spruces that overcompensates the two-times stronger ecosystem respiration at the drained site. The larger productivity of the spruces can be clearly attributed to the larger plant area index (PAI) of the spruce site. However, even though current flux measurements indicate strong CO_2 uptake of the drained spruce forest, the site is a strong net CO_2 source when the whole lifecycle since forest planting is considered. It is important to access this result in terms of the long-term biome balance. To do so, we used historical data to estimate the difference between carbon fixation by the spruces and the carbon loss from the peat due to drainage since forest planting. This rough estimate indicates a strong carbon release of +134 t Cha~(-1) within the last 44 years. Thus, the spruces would need to grow for another 100 years at about the current rate, to compensate the potential peat loss of the former years. In contrast, the natural bog-pine ecosystem has likely been a small but stable carbon sink for decades, which our results suggest is very robust regarding short-term changes of environmental factors.
机译:这项研究比较了德国南部前高山地区天然沼泽森林和为森林排干的沼泽的CO_2交换。这些地点仅相距10公里,它们具有相同的土壤形成历史,并处于相同的气候和天气条件下。相反,它们的土地利用历史不同:在Schechenfilz站点上,天然的沼泽松树林(Pinus mugo ssp。rotundata)生长在未扰动的约5m厚的泥炭层上。在Mooseurach,一块种植了云杉的森林(Picea abies)生长在排水和退化的泥炭上(3.4 m)。使用涡度协方差技术研究了两个地点(2010年7月至2012年6月)的CO_2(NEE)净生态系统交换。我们的结果表明,Mooseurach的排水森林沼泽比第一年和第二年的二氧化碳汇更强(分别为-130±31和-300±66 gCm〜(-2)a〜(-1))。 Schechenfilz的天然沼泽森林(-53±28和-73±38 gCm〜(-2)a〜(-1))。 44年生的云杉具有较高的总初级生产力,这可以补偿干旱地区两倍的更强的生态系统呼吸,这可以解释为强劲的净CO_2吸收。云杉较大的生产率可以明显归因于云杉部位的较大植物面积指数(PAI)。但是,即使当前的通量测量结果表明,从流失的云杉林中大量吸收了CO_2,但从植树造林的整个生命周期来看,该地点还是一个强大的净CO_2来源。就长期的生物群落平衡而言,获得该结果很重要。为此,我们使用历史数据来估算云杉固定碳与自植树以来由于排水造成的泥炭碳损失之间的差异。这个粗略的估计表明,在过去的44年中,碳释放量高达134 t Cha〜(-1)。因此,云杉需要以目前的速度再增长100年,以补偿前几年的潜在泥炭损失。相反,几十年来,天然的沼泽松树生态系统可能是一个很小但稳定的碳汇,我们的结果表明,就环境因素的短期变化而言,碳汇非常稳健。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号