...
首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences Discussions >Can a bog drained for forestry be a stronger carbon sink than a natural bog forest?
【24h】

Can a bog drained for forestry be a stronger carbon sink than a natural bog forest?

机译:排干林业的沼泽能比天然沼泽森林更强大的碳汇吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

pstrongAbstract./strong This study compares the COsub2/sub exchange of a natural bog forest, and of a bog drained for forestry in the pre-Alpine region of southern Germany. The sites are separated by only 10 km, they share the same soil formation history and are exposed to the same climate and weather conditions. In contrast, they differ in land use history at the Schechenfilz site a natural bog-pine forest (iPinus mugo/i ssp. rotundata) grows on an undisturbed, about 5 m thick peat layer; at Mooseurach a planted spruce forest (iPicea abies/i) grows on drained and degraded peat (3.4 m). The net ecosystem exchange of COsub2/sub (NEE) at both sites has been investigated for 2 years (July 2010a??June 2012), using the eddy covariance technique. Our results indicate that the drained, forested bog at Mooseurach is a much stronger carbon dioxide sink (a??130 ?± 31 and a??300 ?± 66 g C msupa??2/sup asupa??1/sup in the first and second year, respectively) than the natural bog forest at Schechenfilz (a??53 ?± 28 and a??73 ?± 38 g C msupa??2/sup asupa??1/sup). The strong net COsub2/sub uptake can be explained by the high gross primary productivity of the 44-year old spruces that over-compensates the two-times stronger ecosystem respiration at the drained site. The larger productivity of the spruces can be clearly attributed to the larger plant area index (PAI) of the spruce site. However, even though current flux measurements indicate strong COsub2/sub uptake of the drained spruce forest, the site is a strong net COsub2/sub source when the whole life-cycle since forest planting is considered. It is important to access this result in terms of the long-term biome balance. To do so, we used historical data to estimate the difference between carbon fixation by the spruces and the carbon loss from the peat due to drainage since forest planting. This rough estimate indicates a strong carbon release of +134 t C hasupa??1/sup within the last 44 years. Thus, the spruces would need to grow for another 100 years at about the current rate, to compensate the potential peat loss of the former years. In contrast, the natural bog-pine ecosystem has likely been a small but stable carbon sink for decades, which our results suggest is very robust regarding short-term changes of environmental factors./p.
机译:> >摘要。该研究比较了德国南部前阿尔卑斯山地区的天然沼泽森林和为林业流失的沼泽的CO 2 交换。这些地点仅相距10公里,它们具有相同的土壤形成历史,并处于相同的气候和天气条件下。相反,它们在Schechenfilz站点的土地利用历史上有所不同,Schechenfilz站点上的天然沼泽松树林(Pinus mugo ssp。rotundata)生长在未受干扰的约5 m厚的泥炭层上。在Mooseurach,一棵人工种植的云杉林( Picea abies )生长在排水和退化的泥炭上(3.4 m)。使用涡度协方差技术研究了两个站点的CO 2 (NEE)的净生态系统交换,时间为2年(2010年7月至2012年6月)。我们的结果表明,Mooseurach的排水森林沼泽是一个更强的二氧化碳汇(a ?? 130?±31和a ?? 300?±66 g C m a ?? 2 a <在第一年和第二年分别超过了Schechenfilz的天然沼泽森林(a ?? 53?±28和a ?? 73?±38 g C m a? ?2 a a ?? 1 )。高净CO 2 吸收量可以用44年生的云杉的高总初级生产力来解释,该总生产力过度补偿了流失地点两倍的更强的生态系统呼吸作用。云杉较大的生产率可以明显归因于云杉部位的较大植物面积指数(PAI)。但是,即使当前的通量测量结果表明,流失的云杉林对CO 2 的吸收很强,但从植树以来的整个生命周期来看,该站点是CO 2 的净净源。被认为。就长期的生物群落平衡而言,获取该结果很重要。为此,我们使用历史数据来估算云杉固定碳与自植树以来由于排水造成的泥炭碳损失之间的差异。该粗略估算表明,在过去的44年中,碳释放量高达+134 t C ha a ?? 1 。因此,云杉需要以目前的速度再增长100年,以补偿前几年的潜在泥炭损失。相比之下,数十年来,天然的沼泽松木生态系统可能只是一个很小但稳定的碳汇,这对于环境因素的短期变化而言非常可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号