...
首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences >Can a bog drained for forestry be a stronger carbon sink than a natural bog forest?
【24h】

Can a bog drained for forestry be a stronger carbon sink than a natural bog forest?

机译:对于林业而排出的沼泽可以是一个比天然沼泽森林更强大的碳汇?

获取原文

摘要

This study compares the CO2 exchange of a natural bog forest, and of abog drained for forestry in the pre-Alpine region of southern Germany. Thesites are separated by only 10 km, they share the same soilformation history and are exposed to the same climate and weather conditions.In contrast, they differ in land use history: at the Schechenfilz site anatural bog-pine forest (Pinus mugo ssp. rotundata) grows on anundisturbed, about 5 m thick peat layer; at Mooseurach a planted spruceforest (Picea abies) grows on drained and degraded peat (3.4 m).The net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE) at both sites has beeninvestigated for 2 years (July 2010–June 2012), using the eddycovariance technique. Our results indicate that the drained, forested bog atMooseurach is a much stronger carbon dioxide sink (?130 ± 31 and?300 ± 66 g C m?2 a?1 in the first and second year,respectively) than the natural bog forest at Schechenfilz (?53 ± 28and ?73 ± 38 g C m?2 a?1). The strong net CO2uptake can be explained by the high gross primary productivity of the 44-yearold spruces that over-compensates the two-times stronger ecosystemrespiration at the drained site. The larger productivity of the spruces canbe clearly attributed to the larger plant area index (PAI) of the sprucesite. However, even though current flux measurements indicate strong CO2uptake of the drained spruce forest, the site is a strong net CO2 sourcewhen the whole life-cycle since forest planting is considered. It isimportant to access this result in terms of the long-term biome balance. Todo so, we used historical data to estimate the difference between carbonfixation by the spruces and the carbon loss from the peat due to drainagesince forest planting. This rough estimate indicates a strong carbon releaseof +134 t C ha?1 within the last 44 years. Thus, the spruces wouldneed to grow for another 100 years at about the current rate, to compensatethe potential peat loss of the former years. In contrast, the naturalbog-pine ecosystem has likely been a small but stable carbon sink fordecades, which our results suggest is very robust regarding short-termchanges of environmental factors.
机译:本研究比较了自然沼泽林的CO 2 交换,以及在德国南部高山地区的林业中的ABOG排水。他们只有10公里分开,它们分享了相同的碎片历史,并暴露在相同的气候和天气条件下。对比,他们在土地利用历史上有所不同:在Schechenfilz站点野生沼泽森林( Pinus mugo SSP。罗德坦)在零嘌呤上的大约5米厚的泥炭层上生长;在Mooseurach A种植的Spruceflest( Picea abies )在排水和降解的泥炭上生长(3.4米)。这两个地点的CO 2 (Nee)的净生态系统交换已被取消2年(2010年7月至2012年6月),使用eddy转规技术。我们的结果表明,排水的森林沼泽大气压是一个更强大的二氧化碳水槽(?130±31和?300±66g C m 2 a ?1 第一年和第二年)分别比Schechenfilz的自然沼泽森林(?53±28and?73±38 g C m 2 a 1 )。强净净CO 2 摄取可以通过44岁血管的高总初级生产力来解释,这些潮流过度补偿排水位点的两倍更强的生态系统股票。云杉的较大生产率可以明确归因于Sprumedite的较大植物区域指数(PAI)。然而,尽管目前的助焊量测量表明,所排出的云杉森林的强股份CO 2 摄取,该网站是一个强大的净CO 2 源处,自森林种植以来的整个生命周期经过考虑的。在长期生物群系平衡方面,它仍然是访问这一结果。因此,我们使用了历史数据来估计云杉的碳固定混凝剂与泥炭植物引起的泥炭碳损失之间的差异。这种粗略估计显示在过去44年内+134 T C HA 1 的强碳释放。因此,云杉在达到目前速率的另一个100年内生长,以补偿前几年的潜在泥炭损失。相比之下,天然的杉木生态系统可能是一个小但稳定的碳汇超过,我们的结果表明对环境因素的短期硬件非常稳健。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号