首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Measuring the effects of a visual or auditory Stroop task on dual-task costs during obstacle crossing
【24h】

Measuring the effects of a visual or auditory Stroop task on dual-task costs during obstacle crossing

机译:测量视觉或听觉Stroop任务对障碍物穿越过程中双工成本的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Successful planning and execution of motor strategies while concurrently performing a cognitive task has been previously examined, but unfortunately the varied and, numerous cognitive tasks studied has limited our fundamental understanding of how the central nervous system successfully integrates and executes these,tasks simultaneously. To gain a better understanding of these mechanisms we used a set of cognitive tasks requiring similar central executive function processes and response outputs but requiring different perceptual mechanisms to perform the motor task. Thirteen healthy young adults (20.6 +/- 1.6 years old) were instrumented with kinematic markers.(60 Hz) and completed 5 practice, 10 single-task obstacle walking trials and two 40 trial experimental blocks. Each block contained 20 trials of seated (single-task) trials followed by 20 cognitive and obstacle (30% lower leg length) crossing trials (dual task). Blocks were randomly presented and included either an auditory Stroop task (AST; central interference only) or a visual Stroop task (VST; combined central and structural interference). Higher accuracy rates and shorter response times were observed for the VST versus AST single-task trials (p < 0.05). Conversely, for the obstacle stepping performance, larger dual task costs were observed for the VST as compared to the AST for clearance measures (the VST induced larger clearance values for both the leading and trailing feet), indicating VST tasks caused greater interference for obstacle crossing (p < 0.05). These results supported the hypothesis that structural interference has a larger effect on, motor performance in a dual-task situation compared to cognitive tasks that pose interference at only the central processing stage. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:先前已经检查了在同时执行认知任务的同时成功执行运动策略的计划和执行,但是不幸的是,所研究的多种多样的认知任务限制了我们对中枢神经系统如何成功整合并同时执行这些任务的基本理解。为了更好地理解这些机制,我们使用了一组认知任务,这些任务需要类似的中央执行功能过程和响应输出,但是需要不同的感知机制来执行运动任务。用运动学标记物(60 Hz)对13名健康的年轻人(20.6 +/- 1.6岁)进行了仪器测试,并完成了5次练习,10次单项障碍行走试验和2个40个试验性实验块。每个块包含20个就座(单任务)试验,然后进行20个认知和障碍(小腿长30%)交叉试验(双重任务)。随机提出块,包括听觉Stroop任务(AST;仅中央干扰)或视觉Stroop任务(VST;中央和结构干扰相结合)。 VST与AST单任务试验相比,观察到更高的准确率和更短的响应时间(p <0.05)。相反,对于障碍物的踩踏性能,相比于AST而言,VST的双重任务成本较高(VST导致前脚和后脚的较大间隙值),这表明VST任务对障碍物的干扰更大(p <0.05)。这些结果支持这样的假设:与仅在中央处理阶段造成干扰的认知任务相比,在双任务情况下结构性干扰对运动性能的影响更大。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号