...
首页> 外文期刊>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: Official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) >Comparison of the efficacy and safety of faropenem daloxate and cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adults.
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of faropenem daloxate and cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adults.

机译:法罗培南多洛西酯和头孢呋辛酯治疗成人急性细菌性上颌窦炎的疗效和安全性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this multicentre, multinational, comparative, double-blind clinical trial, outpatients with both clinical signs and symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute sinusitis were randomly assigned to receive for 7 days either a twice-daily oral regimen of faropenem daloxate (300 mg) or a twice daily oral regimen of cefuroxime axetil (250 mg). Among 452 patients considered valid for clinical efficacy, faropenem daloxate treatment was found to be statistically equivalent to cefuroxime axetil (89.0% vs. 88.4%-95% CI=-5.2%; +6.4%) at the 7-16 days post-therapy assessment. At 28-35 days post-therapy, the continued clinical cure rate in the faropenem daloxate group was 92.6% and that for the cefuroxime axetil group was 94.9% (95% CI: -6.8%; +1.2%). A total of 148 organisms was obtained in 136 microbiologically valid patients (30.1%). The predominant causative organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae (47.1%), Haemophilus influenzae (30.1%), Staphylococcus aureus (14.7%) and Moraxella catarrhalis (8.8%). The bacteriological success rate at the 7-16 days post-therapy evaluation was similar in both treatment groups: 91.5% and 90.8% in the faropenem daloxate and cefuroxime axetil groups, respectively (95% CI=-9.2%; +9.5%). Eradication or presumed eradication was detected for 97.3% and 96.3% of S. pneumoniae, 85.0% and 90.5% of H. influenzae, 88.9% and 90.9% of S. aureus and 100.0% and 83.3% of M. catarrhalis in faropenem daloxate and cefuroxime axetil recipients, respectively. At least one drug-related event was reported by 9.5% of the faropenem daloxate-treated patients and by 10.3% of those who received cefuroxime axetil. The most frequently reported drug-related events were diarrhoea (2.2% versus 2.9%), nausea/vomiting (1.5% vs. 0.7%), abdominal pain (0.7% vs 1.5%) and skin reactions (1.5% vs. 1.1%). Overall, faropenem daloxate was at least as effective clinically and bacteriologically as cefuroxime axetil and was well tolerated.
机译:在这项多中心,多国,比较,双盲临床试验中,将具有临床症状和体征且放射影像学证实为急性鼻窦炎的门诊患者随机分配为接受法罗培南多洛西酯(300 mg)每日两次口服方案或每天两次口服方案头孢呋辛酯(250 mg)每日两次口服方案。在452名被认为具有临床疗效的患者中,法罗培南多洛西酯治疗在治疗后7至16天在统计学上等效于头孢呋辛酯(89.0%vs. 88.4%-95%CI = -5.2%; + 6.4%)评定。在治疗后28-35天,法罗培南多洛西酯组的持续临床治愈率为92.6%,而头孢呋辛酯组为94.9%(95%CI:-6.8%; + 1.2%)。在136例具有微生物学有效性的患者中共获得148个生物体(占30.1%)。主要的致病菌是肺炎链球菌(47.1%),流感嗜血杆菌(30.1%),金黄色葡萄球菌(14.7%)和卡他莫拉菌(8.8%)。两个治疗组在治疗后7-16天评估的细菌学成功率相似:法罗培南多洛西酯和头孢呋辛酯组分别为91.5%和90.8%(95%CI = -9.2%; + 9.5%)。在法罗培南多洛西酯和头孢呋辛酯的接受者。接受法罗培南多洛西酯治疗的患者和接受头孢呋辛酯治疗的患者中,有9.5%和至少10.3%的患者报告了至少一项与药物有关的事件。最常报告的药物相关事件是腹泻(2.2%比2.9%),恶心/呕吐(1.5%比0.7%),腹痛(0.7%比1.5%)和皮肤反应(1.5%比1.1%)。 。总体而言,法罗培南多洛西酯在临床和细菌学上至少与头孢呋辛酯一样有效,并且耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号