首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based mental health >Rethinking evidence-based practice for children's mental health
【24h】

Rethinking evidence-based practice for children's mental health

机译:对基于证据的儿童心理健康实践的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Typically, evidence-based practice (EBP) refers to health practitioners applying the best currently available research evidence in the provision of health services. In other words, EBP challenges practitioners to "do things right" and to "do the right things" EBP originated in medicine, where an estimated 10 000 new randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are published every year but where an estimated 20%-40% of services still do not reflect the best research evidence. Related disciplines such as psychology have also embraced the EBP movement to bridge research and practice in order to improve outcomes for people with mental disorders. In children's mental health, high levels of unmet service need suggest a strong role for EBP. At any given time 14% of children experience mental disorders that cause significant distress and impair their functioning, yet only 25% of these children receive specialised mental health treatment services. It is also clear that children's mental health services often fail to reflect the best available research evidence, leading researchers to argue that EBP is an ethical imperative if we are to improve children's mental health.
机译:通常,循证实践(EBP)是指卫生从业人员在提供卫生服务中应用当前可获得的最佳研究证据。换句话说,EBP挑战从业者“做正确的事”和“做正确的事” EBP起源于医学,据估计每年出版1万个新的随机对照试验(RCT),但估计有20%-40服务的百分比仍未反映最佳研究证据。心理学等相关学科也接受了EBP运动,以衔接研究与实践,以改善精神障碍患者的预后。在儿童的心理健康中,未满足服务需求的高水平表明EBP发挥了重要作用。在任何给定的时间,有14%的儿童会经历精神障碍,从而导致严重的困扰并损害其功能,但只有25%的儿童获得了专门的心理健康治疗服务。显然,儿童的心理健康服务常常无法反映出现有的最佳研究证据,导致研究人员认为,如果我们要改善儿童的心理健康,EBP是一项道德上的当务之急。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号