...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of ophthalmology >The efficacy and safety of timolol maleate versus brinzolamide each given twice daily added to travoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma.
【24h】

The efficacy and safety of timolol maleate versus brinzolamide each given twice daily added to travoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma.

机译:在高血压或原发性开角型青光眼患者中,将马来酸替莫洛尔与布林酰胺分别每日两次给予travoprost的疗效和安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of timolol maleate 0.5% versus brinzolamide 1% when added to travoprost 0.004% in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN: A prospective, double-masked, randomized, active-controlled, parallel comparison. METHODS: Qualified patients at Visit 1 were placed on travoprost dosed every evening for 4 weeks and then were randomized at baseline (Visit 2) to the addition of timolol maleate or brinzolamide each given twice daily. Patients returned to clinic at Week 4 (Visit 3) for a safety visit and Week 12 (Visit 4) for an efficacy visit. At Visits 2 and 4 the intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 08:00, 12:00, and 16:00 hours. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients on brinzolamide had a baseline diurnal IOP of 21.5+/-2.2 mmHg and 95 on timolol maleate had 21.3+/-2.5 mmHg, each added to travoprost. The diurnal mean IOP at Week 12 was 18.1+/-2.7 mmHg for brinzolamide and 18.1+/-3.0 mmHg for timolol maleate (p=0.96). There was no statistical difference found between treatment groups in the absolute level of pressure, or in the reduction in IOP from baseline, at each time point or for the diurnal curve (p>0.05). There was no significant difference for any adverse event between groups (p>0.05), with the most common side effect being conjunctival hyperemia in 15/97 (16%) brinzolamide and 6/95 (6%) timolol treated patients (p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that brinzolamide provides similar safety and efficacy compared to timolol maleate when added to travoprost.
机译:目的:比较在高血压,原发性开角型青光眼患者中,将马来酸替莫洛尔(0.00%)与马来酸替莫洛尔(0.001%)联合使用时,马来酸替莫洛尔(0.00%)的疗效和安全性比较。设计:前瞻性,双掩蔽,随机,主动控制,并行比较。方法:将第1次就诊的合格患者每天晚上服用travoprost,共4周,然后在基线(第2次就诊)随机分组,分别加入马来酸替莫洛尔或苯甲酰胺,每天两次。患者在第4周(访问3)返回诊所进行安全访问,在第12周(访问4)返回进行有效性访问。在第2次和第4次就诊时,在08:00、12:00和16:00小时测量眼内压(IOP)。结果:接受苯佐酰胺治疗的九十七例患者的每日平均眼压为21.5 +/- 2.2 mmHg,而马来酸替莫洛尔治疗的95例患者的每日平均眼压为21.3 +/- 2.5 mmHg,每例患者均加用travoprost。第12周的日均IOP浓度为布林唑胺为18.1 +/- 2.7 mmHg,马来酸替莫洛尔为18.1 +/- 3.0 mmHg(p = 0.96)。在每个时间点或昼夜曲线上,治疗组之间的绝对压力水平或眼压自基线的降低均无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。两组之间的任何不良事件之间均无显着差异(p> 0.05),最常见的副作用是15/97(16%)的苯佐酰胺和6/95(6%)的替莫洛治疗的患者结膜充血(p = 0.06 )。结论:这项研究表明,与马来酸替莫洛尔相比,布列佐胺在特拉沃前列素中提供的安全性和疗效相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号