...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics: The official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics >The safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination versus dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
【24h】

The safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination versus dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

机译:布林佐胺1%/噻吗洛尔0.5%固定组合与多佐胺2%/噻吗洛尔0.5%在开角型青光眼或高眼压患者中的安全性和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy and to determine patient preference based on ocular discomfort with fixed combination brinzolamide/timolol and fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who required a change in therapy due to elevated IOP while receiving IOP-lowering medication. Methods: This was a 3-month, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients had open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, which could not be controlled with monotherapy and were randomized to twice daily therapy with either brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% or dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%. IOP assessments were taken at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM at week 2 as well as at months 1, 2, and 3. Patients completed ocular discomfort assessments (based on stinging, burning, feeling of heat or warmth, or sharp pain) on their current IOP lowering therapy at baseline. Results: Of the 114 patients enrolled, 57 received Brinz/Tim and 57 received Dorz/Tim twice daily. Both medications produced statistically relevant IOP reductions, which were similar in both groups at each visit. The IOP reductions with Brinz/Tim ranged from 6.42 to 9.74 mmHg (26.09%-37.46%), whereas Dorz/Tim produced mean IOP reductions ranging from 8.16 to 12.41 mmHg (31.19%-41.44%) (P>0.05). Brinz/Tim showed significantly less ocular irritation (0.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P=0.0004) than Dorz/Tim. Conclusions: Both Brinz/Tim and Dorz/Tim showed similar significant and clinically relevant IOP-lowering efficacy, whereas Brinz/Tim provided superior outcomes in terms of ocular comfort.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者的眼压不适与固定联合使用苯并酰胺/替莫洛和固定联合多佐胺/替莫洛的眼部不适,以比较降低眼内压(IOP)的疗效并确定患者的偏爱由于在接受降低IOP的药物时IOP升高而需要改变治疗方法。方法:这是一个为期3个月的随机,双盲,主动对照,平行组试验。患者患有开角型青光眼或高眼压症,单药治疗无法控制,并随机分为每日两次两次,分别使用1%的苯二甲酰胺/0.5%的替莫洛尔或2%的多佐胺/0.5%的替莫洛尔。在第2周以及第1、2和3个月的上午8点,上午10点和下午4点进行IOP评估。患者完成了眼部不适评估(基于刺痛,灼痛,热或温暖的感觉或剧烈疼痛) )在基线时降低眼压的当前治疗方法。结果:纳入的114名患者中,每天两次两次接受Brinz / Tim接受治疗的有57名,接受Dorz / Tim接受治疗的有57位。两种药物均产生统计学上相关的IOP降低,两组每次访视相似。 Brinz / Tim的IOP降低范围为6.42至9.74 mmHg(26.09%-37.46%),而Dorz / Tim的平均IOP降低范围为8.16至12.41 mmHg(31.19%-41.44%)(P> 0.05)。 Brinz / Tim的眼睛刺激性明显低于Dorz / Tim(分别为0.5%和15.7%; P = 0.0004)。结论:Brinz / Tim和Dorz / Tim均显示出相似且显着且与临床相关的降低IOP的功效,而Brinz / Tim在眼舒适性方面提供了更好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号