首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal >Prospective comparison of laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion plus myomectomy with classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy for symptomatic fibroid treatment: differences in post-operative quality-of-life measures.
【24h】

Prospective comparison of laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion plus myomectomy with classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy for symptomatic fibroid treatment: differences in post-operative quality-of-life measures.

机译:腹腔镜子宫动脉闭塞加子宫肌瘤切除术与经典筋膜内race上子宫切除术对症肌瘤治疗的前瞻性比较:术后生活质量指标的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Prospective comparison of laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion plus myomectomy (LUAO+M) with classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy (CISH) for symptomatic fibroid treatment, regarding differences in post-operative quality-of-life measures. STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred and thirty-two women with symptomatic fibroids who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively randomized into two treatment groups. The study group consisted of 158 women treated with LUAO+M. The control group contained 174 women treated with CISH. Quality of life was measured before surgery and at 2- and 24-month follow-up visits with the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), 4-domain questionnaire adapted for Chinese-speaking patients. RESULTS: By age, education, operation time, operative blood loss, and pre-operative WHOQOL-BREF 4-domain and overall scores, both groups were statistically equivalent, demonstrating that the randomization process worked. At 24 months, overall scores were improved for both the study group and control group patients (P<0.01). At 2 months post-surgery, physical domain and social relationship domain scores were statistically higher in the study group than the control group patients (P<0.01). By 24 months, the study group patients' overall scores were statistically higher than the control group scores (P<0.01) because of greater improvements in the physical, psychological, and social relationship domain scores. Only in the environmental domain were the study group and the control group scores statistically equivalent. At 24-month follow-up, the study group patients had a fibroid recurrence rate of only 2.53%-low by historical standards. CONCLUSION: At 24-month follow-up, overall WHOQOL-BREF scores were statistically improved for the study group and control group patients. At the same statistical level, however, women in the study group had greater overall improvement than women in the control group because of higher scores in three of the four questionnaire domains. Women treated with LUAO+M have a very low fibroid recurrence rate at 24 months.
机译:目的:对腹腔镜子宫动脉闭塞+子宫肌瘤切除术(LUAO + M)与经典筋膜内race上子宫切除术(CISH)进行有症状的肌瘤治疗进行前瞻性比较,以评估术后生活质量的差异。研究设计:将符合入选标准的322名有症状肌瘤的妇女前瞻性随机分为两个治疗组。该研究组由158名接受LUAO + M治疗的妇女组成。对照组包括174名接受CISH治疗的妇女。生活质量是在手术前以及在2个月和24个月的随访中使用世界卫生组织的生活质量BREF(WHOQOL-BREF)测量的,该问卷适用于说汉语的患者,分为4域。结果:根据年龄,学历,手术时间,手术失血量以及术前WHOQOL-BREF 4分和总分,两组在统计学上均相等,表明随机分组过程有效。在24个月时,研究组和对照组患者的总体评分均得到改善(P <0.01)。术后2个月,研究组的身体领域和社会关系领域得分在统计学上高于对照组患者(P <0.01)。到24个月时,研究组患者的总体评分在统计学上高于对照组(P <0.01),因为他们在身体,心理和社会关系领域的评分有了更大的提高。仅在环境领域,研究组和对照组的得分在统计学上是相等的。在24个月的随访中,研究组患者的肌瘤复发率仅2.53%,低于历史标准。结论:在24个月的随访中,研究组和对照组患者的总体WHOQOL-BREF评分均有统计学上的改善。然而,在相同的统计水平上,由于在四个调查问卷领域中的三个领域得分较高,因此研究组中的女性比对照组中的女性有更大的整体改善。用LUAO + M治疗的女性在24个月时的肌瘤复发率非常低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号