首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >A randomized prospective trial of the postoperative quality of life between laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: clinical trial design
【2h】

A randomized prospective trial of the postoperative quality of life between laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: clinical trial design

机译:腹腔镜子宫动脉结扎与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤之间术后生活质量的随机前瞻性试验:临床试验设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundLaparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy is one of the definite methods for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids with lesser intraoperative bleeding and shorter hospitalization compared with abdominal hysterectomy. However, laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy cannot preserve uterus and can show postoperative complications by the change of pelvic structure. Thus, laparoscopic uterine artery ligation has been introduced for relieving the symptoms caused by uterine fibroids in place of hysterectomy. The current study was designed to compare postoperative quality of life between laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation which can treat symptomatic uterine fibroids with the preservation of uterus.
机译:背景腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术是治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的确切方法之一,与腹部子宫切除术相比,术中出血少,住院时间短。然而,腹腔镜辅助的阴道子宫切除术不能保存子宫,并且可以通过骨盆结构的改变显示出术后并发症。因此,已经引入了腹腔镜子宫动脉结扎术来代替子宫切除术来缓解由子宫肌瘤引起的症状。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜子宫动脉结扎术和腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的术后生活质量,并评估腹腔镜子宫动脉结扎术可治疗症状性子宫肌瘤并保存子宫的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号