...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal >Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes.
【24h】

Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes.

机译:单端口腹腔镜附件手术与常规腹腔镜附件手术:围手术期效果的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the peri-operative outcomes of single port access (SPA) laparoscopic adnexal surgery and conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study matched by body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)). A single surgeon (T-JK) performed 17 SPA laparoscopic adnexal surgeries (cases) consecutively between December 2008 and March 2009; 34 conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgeries (controls) were performed by another surgeon who had similar surgical skill at our hospital during the same time period. Data on the SPA laparoscopic adnexal surgery cases were collected prospectively into our data registry after Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and we reviewed the data on the controls from the electronic medical records with IRB approval. RESULTS: In both groups all procedures were performed without failure. Among preoperative baseline characteristics there was no difference between the two groups including preoperative size of ovarian tumor and bilaterality. The pathology findings were similar; a mature cystic teratoma was the most common pathological feature in both groups. The two groups were comparable with regard to operative outcomes according the surgery type. There were no differences between SPA and conventional groups in median operation time (64 min vs. 57.5 min, p=0.252), the number of patients that requested additional parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (7 patients vs. 19 patients, p=0.597), and the absolute decrease (1.3mg/dl vs. 1.1mg/dl, p=0.640) from preoperative hemoglobin to postoperative day 1 measurements. No patient from either cohort required a blood transfusion. There were no complications in either group including umbilical incision complications in the SPA group. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that SPA laparoscopic adnexal surgery had comparable operative outcomes to conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery. A prospective comparison is needed for confirmation and to define the role of SPA in gynecological adnexal surgery.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较单口入路(SPA)腹腔镜附件手术和常规腹腔镜附件手术的围手术期效果。研究设计:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,与体重指数(BMI; kg / m(2))相匹配。在2008年12月至2009年3月期间,一名外科医生(T-JK)连续进行了17例SPA腹腔镜附件手术(病例);另一位在同一时间在我院具有类似手术技能的外科医生进行了34例常规的腹腔镜附件手术(对照)。在机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,将SPA腹腔镜附件手术病例的数据前瞻性地收集到我们的数据注册表中,并且在IRB批准的情况下,我们从电子病历中审查了有关对照的数据。结果:两组均完成所有手术,均未失败。术前基线特征在两组之间无差异,包括术前卵巢肿瘤大小和双侧性。病理结果相似。两组中最常见的病理特征是成熟的囊性畸胎瘤。根据手术类型,两组在手术结果方面具有可比性。 SPA与常规组之间的中位手术时间(64分钟对57.5分钟,p = 0.252),需要额外肠胃外非甾体类抗炎药的患者人数(7位患者对19位患者,p = 0.597),并且从术前血红蛋白到术后第1天测量的绝对值降低了(1.3mg / dl对1.1mg / dl,p = 0.640)。任何一个队列的患者都不需要输血。两组均无并发症,包括SPA组有脐切口并发症。结论:我们的研究表明,SPA腹腔镜附件手术的手术结果与常规腹腔镜附件手术相当。需要进行前瞻性比较以进行确认并确定SPA在妇科附件手术中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号