...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastronomica >Don't Mono-crop the Movement: Toward a Cultural Ecology of Local Food
【24h】

Don't Mono-crop the Movement: Toward a Cultural Ecology of Local Food

机译:不要单打独斗:走向当地美食的文化生态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the past generation, advocates for healthier food and agriculture have drawn on the farm-to-fork trope to define spatial arrangements in the foodshed. Consider farmers' markets, food hubs, community supported agriculture (CSA), co-ops, rooftop, community, and schoolyard gardens, 100-Mile Diets, and urban farms: the architecture of reform is endless, but every part seeks to reduce the distance between food producers (farms) and consumers (forks). For all the intuitive appeal of the farm-to-fork trope, however, there are other ways to think about the local food movement's spatial configurations that could be more inclusive, multidimensional, and politically potent. This article argues that instead of a distance versus proximity orientation, good-food advocates might envision a kind of cultural ecology of various efforts toward healthier food and agriculture. This perspective shows the various organizational efforts of a region interacting like species in a healthy ecosystem. Where farmers' markets might be gentrified, for example, community gardens and urban farms might not; where urban farms might be labor intensive, food hubs might not and could offer healthier food in urban spaces; where food hubs might not be convenient enough, virtual marketplaces might. The downsides of one part are carried by the advantages of another; the limitations of the first are helped by the strengths of the next. What matters here are not just the particular individual innovations —farmers' markets, CSAs, foodhubs, etc.— but the ways in which they overlap to build an interdependent whole. No longer one-dimensional, this cultural ecology adds political and organizational integrity to the physical integrity of food.
机译:在过去的一代中,倡导更健康的粮食和农业的倡导者采用了从农场到餐桌的方法,以定义食区的空间布置。考虑一下农民的市场,食品中心,社区支持的农业(CSA),合作社,屋顶,社区和校园花园,100英里饮食和城市农场:改革的架构是无止境的,但是每个部分都力求减少食品生产者(农场)和消费者(叉子)之间的距离。但是,对于农场到餐桌的所有直觉吸引力,还有其他方法可以考虑本地食品运动的空间结构,这些结构可能更具包容性,多维性和政治影响力。本文认为,美食倡导者可能会设想一种文化生态,而不是距离与距离的接近,而应通过各种文化生态努力实现更健康的粮食和农业。这种观点表明了一个区域在健康生态系统中像物种一样相互作用的各种组织努力。例如,在农贸市场可能高档化的地方,社区花园和城市农场可能不会;在城市农场可能劳动密集的地方,食品中心可能没有,并且可以在城市空间中提供更健康的食物;在食品中心可能不够方便的地方,可以使用虚拟市场。一个部分的缺点是另一部分的优点。前者的局限性得益于后者的优势。这里重要的不只是特定的个体创新(农民市场,CSA,集市等),还包括它们重叠以建立相互依存的整体的方式。这种文化生态不再是一维的,它为食品的物理完整性增加了政治和组织上的完整性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号