首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Transoral endoscopic esophageal myotomy based on esophageal function testing in a survival porcine model.
【24h】

Transoral endoscopic esophageal myotomy based on esophageal function testing in a survival porcine model.

机译:基于生存猪模型中食管功能测试的经口内镜食管肌切开术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment of achalasia is Heller myotomy. OBJECTIVE: To explore a submucosal endoscopic myotomy technique tailored on esophageal physiology testing and to compare it with the open technique. DESIGN: Prospective acute and survival comparative study in pigs (n = 12; 35 kg). SETTING: University animal research center. INTERVENTION: Eight acute-4 open and 4 endoscopic-myotomies followed by 4 survival endoscopic procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative and postoperative manometry; esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility before and after selective division of muscular fibers at the EGJ and after the myotomy was prolonged to a standard length by using the EndoFLIP Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (Crospon, Galway, Ireland). RESULTS: All procedures were successful, with no intraoperative and postoperative complications. In the survival group, the animals recovered promptly from surgery. Postoperative manometry demonstrated a 50% drop in mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESp) in the endoscopic group (mean preoperative LESp, 22.2 +/- 3.3 mm Hg; mean postoperative LESp, 11.34 +/- 2.7 mm Hg; P < .005) and a 69% loss in the open procedure group (mean preoperative LESp, 24.2 +/- 3.2 mm Hg; mean postoperative LESp, 7.4 +/- 4 mm Hg; P < .005). The EndoFLIP monitoring did not show any distensibility difference between the 2 techniques, with the main improvement occurring when the clasp circular fibers were taken. LIMITATIONS: Healthy animal model; small sample. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic submucosal esophageal myotomy is feasible and safe. The lack of a significant difference in EGJ distensibility between the open and endoscopic procedure is very appealing. Were it to be perfected in a human population, this endoscopic approach could suggest a new strategy in the treatment of selected achalasia patients.
机译:背景:失弛缓症最有效的治疗方法是Heller肌切开术。目的:探讨适合食管生理学测试的粘膜下内镜下肌切开术,并将其与开放技术进行比较。设计:在猪中进行的前瞻性急性和生存比较研究(n = 12; 35 kg)。地点:大学动物研究中心。干预:8例急性4开放性和4例内窥镜子宫肌切开术,然后进行4例生存内窥镜检查。主要观察指标:术前,术后测压;通过使用EndoFLIP功能性管腔成像探头(Crospon,Galway,爱尔兰),在EGJ处选择性分裂肌肉纤维之前和之后以及在进行肌切开术之后,食管胃交界处(EGJ)的可扩张性延长至标准长度。结果:所有手术均成功,无术中及术后并发症。在存活组中,动物从手术中迅速康复。术后测压显示内镜组食管括约肌平均下压力(LESp)降低了50%(术前平均LESp为22.2 +/- 3.3毫米汞柱;术后平均平均LESp为11.34 +/- 2.7毫米汞柱; P <.005)在开放手术组中损失了69%(平均术前LESp,24.2 +/- 3.2 mm Hg;平均术后LESp,7.4 +/- 4 mm Hg; P <.005)。 EndoFLIP监测没有显示出这两种技术之间的可扩展性差异,而当采用扣紧的圆形纤维时,主要的改进发生了。局限性:健康的动物模型;小样本。结论:内镜下黏膜食管下肌切开术是可行且安全的。 EGJ的开放性和内窥镜检查之间缺乏明显的区别,这非常吸引人。如果在人群中得到完善,这种内窥镜检查方法可能为治疗所选门失弛缓症患者提出新的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号