首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study.
【24h】

Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study.

机译:社区环境中ERCP的质量指标(包括并发症):一项前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There are no large studies documenting quality outcomes and complication rates of ERCP in community practice. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)/American College of Gastroenterology Task Force on Quality proposed 5 questions regarding ERCP in community practice. The ASGE Committee on Outcomes Research recommended 8 ERCP-specific quality indicators be used to provide a better accounting of quality in ERCP. OBJECTIVE: To determine ERCP quality outcomes, including complications, in a community practice. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Eight community hospitals in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, area. PATIENTS: Every patient undergoing ERCP by Minnesota Gastroenterology PA from December 1, 2005, through July 31, 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: ASGE-recommended quality indicators, especially 30-day complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 805 ERCP procedures were performed in 696 patients. Therapeutic ERCP accounted for 78.4%. The complication rate was 5.0% (5.7% of therapeutic and 2.3% of diagnostic procedures). Pancreatitis occurred in 3.2% of procedures (3.6% of therapeutic and 1.7% of diagnostic procedures). Infection (0.75%), hemorrhage (0.62%), and perforation (0.12%) only occurred after therapeutic ERCP. Cardiopulmonary complications occurred in 2 patients (0.25%). Precut sphincterotomy was performed in 26 cases (3.2%), and sphincter of Oddi manometry in 23 cases (2.9%). Success rates were 94.0% for biliary cannulation, 87.0% for stone extraction, and 90.2% for relieving biliary obstruction. A total of 530 patient satisfaction surveys were completed and revealed that the response to the question, "Would you have the procedure done again by this physician?" was the most sensitive indicator of patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In this community practice, complication rates compare very favorably with those of academic centers. The technical success rates achieved or exceeded rates recommended by the ASGE/American College of Gastroenterology Task Force.
机译:背景:目前尚无大型研究记录社区实践中ERCP的质量结果和并发症发生率。美国胃肠内窥镜学会(ASGE)/美国胃肠病学院质量工作队提出了有关社区实践中ERCP的5个问题。 ASGE结果研究委员会建议使用8个特定于ERCP的质量指标,以更好地评估ERCP的质量。目的:确定社区实践中的ERCP质量结果,包括并发症。设计:前瞻性研究。地点:明尼阿波利斯街的八家社区医院。保罗,明尼苏达州。患者:从2005年12月1日至2006年7月31日,明尼苏达州胃肠病学协会对所有接受ERCP治疗的患者进行了评估。主要指标:ASGE建议使用质量指标,尤其是30天并发症发生率。结果:共对696例患者进行了805次ERCP手术。治疗性ERCP占78.4%。并发症发生率为5.0%(治疗率为5.7%,诊断为2.3%)。胰腺炎发生在手术的3.2%(治疗的3.6%和诊断的1.7%)中。仅在ERCP治疗后才发生感染(0.75%),出血(0.62%)和穿孔(0.12%)。 2名患者(0.25%)发生心肺并发症。预切括约肌切开术26例(占3.2%),Oddi压力括约肌切开术23例(占2.9%)。胆管插管的成功率为94.0%,结石摘除的成功率为87.0%,缓解胆管阻塞的成功率为90.2%。总共进行了530次患者满意度调查,结果表明,对问题“您是否可以由这位医生再次进行手术?”的回答。是患者满意度的最敏感指标。结论:在这种社区实践中,并发症发生率与学术中心相比非常有利。技术成功率达到或超过了ASGE /美国胃肠病学院任务组的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号