首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study.
【24h】

Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study.

机译:ERCP后并发症的危险因素;大规模,前瞻性多中心研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Analyses of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complication are often constrained by the number of endpoints observed. This large-scale study aimed to identify the principal risk factors for ERCP complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study of ERCP complications, based in five English regions. An exploratory univariable analysis of patients' first recorded procedures identified potentially important patient- and procedure-related factors. For overall complications and pancreatitis, variables significant in univariable analysis were included in multiple regression. RESULTS: A total of 66 centers collected data on 5264 ERCPs, performed on 4561 patients. A therapeutic intervention was attempted in 3447/4561 (76%) of patients as part of their first recorded ERCP. Following first recorded ERCP, 230 patients (5.0%) suffered > or = 1 complication: pancreatitis in 74 (1.6%), cholangitis in 48 (1.0 %), hemorrhage in 40 (0.9%), perforation in 20 (0.4%), and miscellaneous in 54 (1.2%). Significant factors from multiple regression were included in a multi-level analysis, which incorporated variables measured at the level of the endoscopist and hospital. For overall complication, risk factors ( P value, odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]) were: cannulation attempts > 1 ( P = 0.094, OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.95-1.83), precut ( P = 0.033, OR 1.55, 95 % CI 1.04-2.32), and suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction ( P = 0.121, OR 1.97, 95 % CI 0.84-4.64). For pancreatitis, risk factors ( Pvalue, OR, and 95 % CI) were: cannulation attempts > 1 ( P = 0.0001, OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.74-5.67), female sex ( P < 0.001, OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.43-3.45), age ( P < 0.002, OR 1.09 per 5 year decrease, 95% CI 1.03-1.15), and performance in a district (as opposed to university) hospital ( P 0.034, OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.08-5.41). CONCLUSION: Careful patient selection combined with skilled cannulation minimizes complications. Higher-risk procedures should be performedin specialist centers.
机译:背景和研究目的:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)并发症的分析通常受观察到的终点数目的限制。这项大规模研究旨在确定ERCP并发症的主要危险因素。病人和方法:这是一项基于ERCP并发症的前瞻性多中心研究,位于五个英国地区。对患者首次记录的程序进行的探索性单变量分析确定了潜在的与患者和程序相关的重要因素。对于总体并发症和胰腺炎,多元回归中包括单因素分析中显着的变量。结果:总共66个中心收集了4264位患者的5264 ERCP数据。作为首次记录的ERCP的一部分,尝试了3447/4561(76%)患者的治疗干预。首次记录ERCP后,有230例(5.0%)患有>或= 1并发症:胰腺炎74例(1.6%),胆管炎48例(1.0%),出血40例(0.9%),穿孔20例(0.4%),其余54个(1.2%)。来自多重回归的重要因素包括在多层次分析中,该分析纳入了内镜医师和医院水平上测得的变量。对于整体并发症,危险因素(P值,优势比[OR],95%置信区间[CI])为:插管尝试次数> 1(P = 0.094,OR 1.32,95%CI 0.95-1.83),预先切割(P = 0.033,或1.55,95%CI 1.04-2.32),以及疑似Oddi括约肌功能障碍(P = 0.121,或1.97,95%CI 0.84-4.64)。对于胰腺炎,危险因素(Pvalue,OR和95%CI)为:插管尝试次数> 1(P = 0.0001,OR 3.14,95%CI 1.74-5.67),女性(P <0.001,OR 2.22,95%CI) 1.43-3.45),年龄(P <0.002,或每5年减少1.09,95%CI 1.03-1.15)和地区(而非大学)医院的表现(P 0.034,OR 2.41,95%CI 1.08- 5.41)。结论:仔细的患者选择与熟练的插管相结合可最大程度地减少并发症。高风险的程序应在专科中心进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号