首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale korean multicenter study.
【24h】

Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale korean multicenter study.

机译:腹腔镜辅助胃切除术治疗胃癌后与并发症相关的危险因素:一项大规模的韩国多中心研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to establish background data for future randomized clinical trial comparing open and laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomies (LAGs). We sought to evaluate the technical feasibility of LAG by determining the morbidity and mortality and identifying corresponding predictive factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was carried out in Korea on 1,485 patients in who, LAG had been attempted for gastric cancer under the care of ten surgeons, at ten institutions, during the period spanning May 1998 to December 2005. Patient characteristics, operative outcomes, and postoperative morbidities and mortalities were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 14.0% and 0.6%, respectively. Complications included: wound problem (4.2%, n = 62), intraluminal bleeding (1.3%, n = 20), intra-abdominal abscess or fluid collection (1.3%, n = 19), anastomotic leakage (1.3%, n = 18), and intra-abdominal bleeding (1.3%, n = 18). By using multivariate analysis we found that the two most important risk factors associated with postoperative complications were presence of comorbidity in the patient and lack of experience on the part of the surgeon. CONCLUSION: LAG is a technically feasible, safe, and effective method for treating patients with gastric cancer. Extra caution in patients with comorbidities, and dedication to improving surgical proficiency in LAG, may decrease the risk of complications. Through this study, we have established the inclusion criteria for LAG. For our multicenter, prospective, randomized trials (NCT00452751), potential patients should have an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of less than 3, and surgeons performing the procedures should have experience with more than 50 cases of LAG.
机译:背景:这项多中心回顾性研究的目的是为比较开放式和腹腔镜辅助胃直肠切除术(LAG)的未来随机临床试验建立背景数据。我们试图通过确定发病率和死亡率并确定相应的预测因素来评估LAG的技术可行性。患者和方法:在韩国进行了一项回顾性多中心研究,研究对象为1998年5月至2005年12月期间在十家医院的十名外科医师的照护下,有1485例LAG曾尝试过胃癌的患者。分析手术结果,术后发病率和死亡率。结果:总体发病率和死亡率分别为14.0%和0.6%。并发症包括:伤口问题(4.2%,n = 62),腔内出血(1.3%,n = 20),腹腔内脓肿或积液(1.3%,n = 19),吻合口漏(1.3%,n = 18) )和腹腔内出血(1.3%,n = 18)。通过多变量分析,我们发现与术后并发症相关的两个最重要的危险因素是患者合并症和外科医生经验不足。结论:LAG是一种治疗胃癌的技术可行,安全有效的方法。合并症患者要格外小心,并致力于改善LAG的手术熟练程度,可降低发生并发症的风险。通过这项研究,我们建立了LAG的纳入标准。对于我们的多中心,前瞻性,随机试验(NCT00452751),潜在患者的美国麻醉学会(ASA)得分应低于3,而执行该程序的外科医生应具有超过50例LAG的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号