首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology >DSM-5 gambling disorder: Prevalence and characteristics in a substance use disorder sample
【24h】

DSM-5 gambling disorder: Prevalence and characteristics in a substance use disorder sample

机译:DSM-5赌博疾病:药物滥用疾病样本中的患病率和特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) replaced the fourth edition's (DSM-IV) diagnosis of Pathological Gambling (PG) with Gambling Disorder (GD). GD differs from PG in that it requires 4 rather than 5 criteria for diagnosis and excludes the "Illegal Acts" criterion. We examined the prevalence of GD and its characteristics and validity in a substance-use disorder (SUD) sample. Participants (N = 6,613) in genetic studies of substance dependence underwent a semistructured psychiatric interview. Individuals who reported ever having gambled $10 at least monthly (n =1,507) were the focus of the analyses. Approximately one third of acknowledged gamblers (n=563; 8.5% of the total sample) received PG (DSM-IV) and GD (DSM-5) diagnoses and 678 (10.3% of the total) received only a DSM-5 diagnosis, representing an increase of 20.4% relative to DSM-IV. Although the 3 groups were comparable demographically, the DSM-5-Only group was intermediate between the other 2 groups on the prevalence of comorbid SUDs, the distribution of DSM-IV PG criteria endorsed, and the types of gambling reported. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that the DSM-5-Only group was more likely than the No-Diagnosis group and less likely than the Both-Diagnoses group to acknowledge a gambling problem. In conclusion, there was a high prevalence of PG in this SUD sample. Analysis of non-DSM variables suggested that the increased sensitivity of the DSM-5 GD diagnosis successfully identifies a broader set of individuals with clinically significant gambling-related problems. Prospective studies of individuals with GD are needed to validate this finding.
机译:精神疾病诊断和统计手册(DSM-5)的第五版用赌博疾病(GD)代替了第四版(DSM-IV)的病理性赌博(PG)诊断。 GD与PG的不同之处在于,它需要4个而不是5个诊断标准,并且排除了“非法行为”标准。我们检查了物质滥用障碍(SUD)样本中GD的患病率及其特征和有效性。参与药物依赖性基因研究的参与者(N = 6,613)接受了半结构性精神病学访谈。报告的重点是曾经至少每月赌博10美元的个人(n = 1,507)。大约三分之一的公认赌徒(n = 563;占样本总数的8.5%)接受PG(DSM-IV)和GD(DSM-5)诊断,而678(占总数的10.3%)仅接受DSM-5诊断,相对于DSM-IV增长20.4%。尽管3组在人口统计学上可比,但DSM-5-Only组在共患病SUD的患病率,DSM-IV PG标准的分布得到认可以及赌博类型方面处于其他2组之间。多项逻辑回归分析表明,仅DSM-5组比不诊断组更有可能承认双重赌博问题。总之,该SUD样本中PG的患病率很高。对非DSM变量的分析表明,DSM-5 GD诊断灵敏度的提高成功地确定了具有临床上重大赌博相关问题的广泛人群。需要对患有GD的个体进行前瞻性研究,以验证这一发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号