首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >Creative City Policy and the Gap with Theory
【24h】

Creative City Policy and the Gap with Theory

机译:创意城市政策与理论差距

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The creative city concept is popular among researchers and policy-makers. On the one hand, academic literature elaborates, on a conceptual level, the importance of creativity and innovation for urban competitiveness; on the other, numerous cities develop and implement creative city policies in practice. The connection between these two is rather weak and, accordingly, creative city policy tends to be ad hoc. Our purpose in this paper is to narrow the above-mentioned gap between theory and practice, by addressing the question of how conceptual insights into the creative city can be converted into an elaborated operational approach for local policy practice. We propose a three-step approach: (1) to position a city's current creative places and communities within the context of social and economic structures, urban narratives and prevailing governance structures and style by means of a systematic analytical framework; (2) to assess the spatial, social and symbolic place qualities of the creative production and consumption; (3) to identify options for effective policy intervention. We further examine how these steps may be applied in practice, and use the city of Delft in the Netherlands as an example. A discussion of the applicability and implementation of this approach concludes the paper.
机译:创意城市概念在研究人员和政策制定者中很受欢迎。一方面,学术文献从概念上阐述了创造力和创新对城市竞争力的重要性。另一方面,许多城市在实践中制定和实施创新性城市政策。两者之间的联系相当薄弱,因此,创造性的城市政策往往是临时性的。本文的目的是通过解决以下问题来缩小理论与实践之间的上述差距:解决如何将对创意城市的概念洞察转化为针对当地政策实践的详尽操作方法。我们提出了三步走的方法:(1)通过系统的分析框架,将城市当前的创意场所和社区定位在社会经济结构,城市叙事以及主要的治理结构和风格的背景下; (二)评估创意生产和消费的空间,社会和象征性场所质量; (3)确定有效的政策干预方案。我们将进一步研究如何在实践中应用这些步骤,并以荷兰代尔夫特市为例。本文对这种方法的适用性和实现进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号