首页> 外文期刊>Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association >Experimental Models for Controlled Burn Injuries in Rats: A Systematic Analysis of Original Methods and Burn Devices
【24h】

Experimental Models for Controlled Burn Injuries in Rats: A Systematic Analysis of Original Methods and Burn Devices

机译:大鼠控制烧伤的实验模型:原始方法和烧伤装置的系统分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Despite a wide variety of models found in literature, choosing the right one can be difficult as many of them are lacking precise methodology. This study aims to analyze and compare original burn models in terms of burn device and technique, parameters, and wound depth assessment. A systematic search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on studies describing original experimental burn models in rats. The adapted PICO formula and ARRIVE checklist were followed for inclusion and assessment of quality of studies. Characteristics of animals, burn technique, burn parameters, and method of histological confirmation of burn depth were recorded. Twenty-seven studies were included in the final analysis. Most studies used direct contact with skin for burn infliction (n = 20). The rat's dorsum was the most common site (n = 18). Ten studies used manually controlled burn devices, while 10 designed automatic burn devices with control over temperature (n = 10), exposure time (n = 5), and pressure (n = 5). Most studies (n = 7) used a single biopsy taken from the center of the wound to confirm burn depth immediately after burn infliction. From the wide variety of burn models in current literature, our study provides an overview of the most relevant experimental burn models in rats aiding researchers to understand what needs to be addressed when designing their burn protocol. Models cannot be compared as burn parameters variate significantly. Assessment of burn depth should be done in a standardized, sequential fashion in future burn studies to increase reproducibility.
机译:尽管在文献中发现了各种各样的模型,但选择正确的模型可能很困难,因为其中许多模型缺乏精确的方法。本研究旨在从烧伤装置和技术、参数和伤口深度评估等方面对原始烧伤模型进行分析和比较。根据PRISMA指南对描述大鼠原始实验烧伤模型的研究进行了系统检索。遵循改编的PICO公式和ARRIVE检查表,以纳入和评估研究质量。记录动物特征、烧伤技术、烧伤参数和烧伤深度的组织学确认方法。最终分析纳入了27项研究。大多数研究使用直接接触皮肤造成烧伤(n=20)。大鼠的背部是最常见的部位(n = 18)。10项研究使用手动控制的烧伤装置,而10项研究设计了控制温度(n = 10)、暴露时间(n = 5)和压力(n = 5)的自动燃烧装置。大多数研究(n=7)使用从伤口中心采集的单次活检来确认烧伤后立即的烧伤深度。从当前文献中各种各样的烧伤模型中,我们的研究概述了大鼠最相关的实验烧伤模型,帮助研究人员了解在设计烧伤方案时需要解决的问题。由于烧伤参数变化很大,因此无法比较模型。在未来的烧伤研究中,应以标准化的顺序方式评估烧伤深度,以提高可重复性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号