首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Safety issues and rationale for neoadjuvant approaches in renal cell carcinoma.
【24h】

Safety issues and rationale for neoadjuvant approaches in renal cell carcinoma.

机译:肾细胞癌新辅助治疗方法的安全性问题和原理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Following the demonstration of their remarkable efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), antiangiogenic drugs are now being tested in adjuvant and neoadjuvant approaches. The combination of surgery and systemic therapy is increasingly thought to be the best therapeutic option in mRCC, even though the timing of surgery is still poorly defined. Neoadjuvant settings include mRCC for selecting responder patients, locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) for improving resectability, and localized RCC for allowing conservative approaches. Regardless of strategy, eventual drawbacks of neoadjuvant treatments are clinical progression or medical complications, thus delaying or preventing surgery, and perioperative morbidities. In this issue of European Urology, Chapin et al addressed the issue of safety of presurgical administration of antiangiogenic drugs through a large comparative series [1].
机译:在证明其在转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)中具有显着疗效后,目前正在以佐剂和新佐剂方法测试抗血管生成药物。手术和全身治疗相结合被越来越多地认为是mRCC的最佳治疗选择,即使手术时机仍然不明确。新辅助设置包括用于选择反应患者的mRCC,用于改善可切除性的局部晚期肾细胞癌(RCC),以及用于保守治疗的局部RCC。无论采取何种策略,新辅助治疗的最终弊端都是临床进展或医学并发症,从而延迟或预防了手术以及围手术期发病。在本期《欧洲泌尿外科》中,Chapin等人通过大量比较性研究探讨了抗血管生成药物的术前给药安全性问题[1]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号