首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Metastatic potential of the small renal mass: why can't we agree?
【24h】

Metastatic potential of the small renal mass: why can't we agree?

机译:小肾脏肿块的转移潜力:我们为什么不能同意?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The vast majority of renal masses are now diagnosed at a low clinical stage and present patients and clinicians with the daunting challenge of multiple treatment options. This is especially true in the elderly and in medically complex patients, patients who prefer to avoid potentially morbid surgical treatment. Small renal masses (SRMs) can be approached with nephron-sparing surgery, radical nephrec-tomy, tumor ablation, or active surveillance depending on tumor features, patient characteristics, and patient preferences. To clarify the most appropriate treatment options and recommendations, patients and providers must weigh the patient's projected longevity, the threat posed by the cancer to shorten this longevity, the effectiveness of available treatments, and the associated morbidity of the treatment choices. For an accurate discussion with our patients, it is vital that we correctly understand the threat of SRMs.
机译:现在,绝大多数肾脏肿块被诊断为处于低临床阶段,给患者和临床医生带来了多种治疗选择的艰巨挑战。在老年人和医疗复杂的患者中,尤其是那些希望避免潜在病态手术治疗的患者,尤其如此。小肾肿块(SRM)可以通过保留肾单位的手术,根治性肾切除术,肿瘤消融或主动监测来实现,具体取决于肿瘤的特征,患者的特征和患者的喜好。为了阐明最合适的治疗方案和建议,患者和提供者必须权衡患者的预期寿命,癌症对缩短寿命的威胁,可用治疗的有效性以及相关治疗选择的发病率。为了与患者进行准确的讨论,正确理解SRM的威胁至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号