首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Comparison of oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1249 cases.
【24h】

Comparison of oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1249 cases.

机译:开放式和腹腔镜肾结直肠癌切除术的肿瘤学结果比较:1249例病例的多机构分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) compared to open nephroureterectomy (ONU) are scarce. OBJECTIVE: We compared recurrence and cause-specific mortality rates of ONU and LNU. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen centers from three continents contributed data on 1249 patients with nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MEASUREMENTS: Univariable and multivariable survival models tested the effect of procedure type (ONU [n=979] vs LNU [n=270]) on cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. Covariables consisted of institution, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score, pT stage, pN stage, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, tumor location, concomitant carcinoma in situ, ureteral cuff management, previous urothelial bladder cancer, and previous endoscopic treatment. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median follow-up for censored cases was 49 mo (mean: 62). Relative to ONU, LNU patients had more favorable pathologic stages (pT0/Ta/Tis: 38.1% vs 20.8%, p<0.001) and less lymphovascular invasion (14.8% vs 21.3%, p=0.02) and less frequently had tumors located in the ureter (64.5 vs 71.1%, p=0.04). In univariable recurrence and cancer-specific mortality models, ONU was associated with higher cancer recurrence and mortality rates compared to LNU (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.1 [p<0.001] and 2.0 [p=0.008], respectively). After adjustment for all covariates, ONU and LNU had no residual effect on cancer recurrence and mortality (p=0.1 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term oncologic data on LNU are comparable to ONU. Since LNU was selectively performed in favorable-risk patients, we cannot state with certainty that ONU and LNU have the same oncologic efficacy in poor-risk patients. Long-term follow-up data and morbidity data are necessary before LNU can be considered as the standard of care in patients with muscle-invasive or high-grade UTUC.
机译:背景:与开腹肾结石切除术(ONU)相比,腹腔镜肾结石切除术(LNU)的肿瘤学疗效数据稀少。目的:我们比较了ONU和LNU的复发率和特定病因死亡率。设计,地点和参与者:来自三大洲的13个中心提供了1249例非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者的数据。测量:单变量和多变量生存模型测试了手术类型(ONU [n = 979] vs LNU [n = 270])对癌症复发和癌症特异性死亡率的影响。协变量包括机构,年龄,东部合作肿瘤小组(ECOG)的表现状态评分,pT分期,pN分期,肿瘤等级,淋巴血管浸润,肿瘤位置,原位癌,输尿管套囊管理,既往尿路上皮膀胱癌和以前的内镜检查治疗。结果与局限性:被检查病例的中位随访时间为49个月(平均62例)。与ONU相比,LNU患者的病理分期更佳(pT0 / Ta / Tis:38.1%vs 20.8%,p <0.001),淋巴管浸润较少(14.8%vs 21.3%,p = 0.02),且肿瘤位于输尿管(64.5 vs 71.1%,p = 0.04)。在单变量复发和癌症特异性死亡率模型中,与LNU相比,ONU与更高的癌症复发率和死亡率相关(危险比[HR]:2.1 [p <0.001]和2.0 [p = 0.008])。在对所有协变量进行调整后,ONU和LNU对癌症的复发和死亡率均无残留影响(两者均p = 0.1)。结论:LNU的短期肿瘤学数据可与ONU媲美。由于LNU是在高危患者中选择性进行的,因此我们无法确定ONU和LNU在低危患者中具有相同的肿瘤学疗效。在将LNU视为具有肌肉浸润性或高级别UTUC的患者的治疗标准之前,需要长期的随访数据和发病率数据。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号