首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: Official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery >Emergency re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention, reoperation, or conservative treatment in patients with acute perioperative graft failure following coronary artery bypass surgery.
【24h】

Emergency re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention, reoperation, or conservative treatment in patients with acute perioperative graft failure following coronary artery bypass surgery.

机译:在冠状动脉搭桥手术后发生急性围手术期移植失败的患者中,采用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,再次手术或保守治疗进行紧急血运重建。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative graft failure following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) results in acute myocardial ischemia/infarction (PMI), which may necessitate an acute secondary revascularization procedure to salvage myocardium, in order to preserve ventricular function and improve patient outcome. Whether acute percutaneous coronary (re)intervention (PCI), emergency reoperation, or conservative intensive care treatment should be applied, is currently unknown. METHODS: In order to identify the source of PMI and to pursue the appropriate re-revascularization strategy, coronary repeat angiography was emergently performed in 118 among 5427 consecutive isolated CABG patients with evidence of PMI. As a result, patients immediately underwent acute PCI (group 1), emergency reoperation (group 2), or were treated conservatively (group 3). Primary study endpoint was postoperative myocardial infarct size, as measured by peak cardiac troponin I (cTnI) serum levels. Secondary endpoints were perioperative leftventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%), assessed by transesophageal echocardiography, major adverse cardiac events, and short- and midterm mortality. RESULTS: Repeat coronary angiography revealed early perioperative bypass graft failure in 67 among 118 patients and 84 among 214 bypass grafts after CABG. The number and type of failing bypass grafts were comparable between groups 1 and 2, but significantly different to that of group 3 (P<0.007). Acute PCI was applied in 25 patients, redo-CABG in 15 patients, and conservative treatment in 27 patients. Procedural peak cTnI serum levels were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (81+/-18 ng/ml vs 178+/-62 ng/ml; P<0.001). Global LVEF was reduced during the acute ischemic event when compared with preoperative values (P<0.01). Thereafter, LVEF improved during follow-up within each group (P<0.001), but did not differ between the three groups. In-hospital and 1-year mortality were 12.0% and 20.0% in group 1, 20.0% and 27% in group 2, and 14.8% and 18.5% in group 3, respectively (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Re-revascularization with emergency PCI may limit the extent of myocardial cellular damage compared with the surgical-based treatment strategy in patients with acute perioperative myocardial ischemia due to early graft failure following CABG.
机译:目的:冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)后的围手术期移植失败会导致急性心肌缺血/梗死(PMI),这可能需要采取急性继发性血运重建术来挽救心肌,以保持心室功能并改善患者预后。目前尚不清楚是否应进行急性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),紧急再次手术或保守的重症监护治疗。方法:为了确定PMI的来源并采取适当的重新血运重建策略,在5427例连续的孤立CABG患者中,有118例急诊行了冠状动脉重复血管造影,以证明PMI。结果,患者立即接受了急性PCI(第1组),紧急再次手术(第2组)或接受了保守治疗(第3组)。主要研究终点为术后心肌梗死面积,以峰值心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)血清水平衡量。次要终点是围手术期左心室射血分数(LVEF%),通过经食管超声心动图,主要不良心脏事件以及短期和中期死亡率进行评估。结果:重复冠状动脉造影显示,CABG术后118例患者中有67例早期围手术期旁路移植失败,而214例旁路移植中84例早期手术。第1组和第2组之间失败的旁路移植物的数量和类型相当,但与第3组明显不同(P <0.007)。 25例患者应用了急性PCI,15例患者应用了redo-CABG,27例患者采用了保守治疗。第1组和第2组之间的程序性峰值cTnI血清水平显着不同(81 +/- 18 ng / ml与178 +/- 62 ng / ml; P <0.001)。与术前相比,急性缺血事件的整体LVEF降低(P <0.01)。此后,每组的随访中LVEF均改善(P <0.001),但三组之间无差异。第一组的住院死亡率和1年死亡率分别为12.0%和20.0%,第二组分别为20.0%和27%,第三组分别为14.8%和18.5%(P = NS)。结论:由于CABG术后早期移植失败导致急性围手术期心肌缺血的患者,与基于外科手术的治疗策略相比,紧急PCI再血管化术可能会限制心肌细胞的损害程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号