...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >A systematic review and meta-analysis of KRAS status as the determinant of response to anti-EGFR antibodies and the impact of partner chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
【24h】

A systematic review and meta-analysis of KRAS status as the determinant of response to anti-EGFR antibodies and the impact of partner chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

机译:系统评价和荟萃分析KRAS的状态,作为对抗EGFR抗体反应的决定因素以及伴侣化学疗法在转移性结直肠癌中的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: In the setting of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), anti-EGFR antibodies are not currently recommended for individuals with KRAS mutant tumours. This is based on subgroup analyses of individual clinical trials rather than a formal synthesis of evidence for KRAS status as a predictive biomarker, while newer trials report no benefit for anti-EGFR antibodies irrespective of KRAS status. This study systematically reviewed the evidence for KRAS mutation status as a treatment effect modifier of response to anti-EGFR antibodies and the influence of partner chemotherapy. METHODS: Medline (1966-2010), EMBASE and American and European oncology meeting abstracts were searched for randomised controlled trials reporting the influence of KRAS status on effectiveness of anti-EGFR antibodies in metastatic CRC. The treatment efficacy was summarised by KRAS status using hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and risk differences (RD) for objective response. For each study, a measure of effect modification was calculated, and aggregated using random effects meta-analysis to assess the interaction between KRAS and treatment effect. FINDINGS: Eleven studies (8924 patients) were selected from 198 reports. Two studies assessed anti-EGFR antibodies as monotherapy and nine their use with chemotherapy. KRAS status was reported in 7555 cases. In subgroup analysis, the progression HR for KRAS wild patients assigned to anti-EGFR antibodies was 0.80 (4436 patients 95%CI: 0.64, 0.99) and for mutant cases 1.11 (3119 patients, 95%CI: 0.97, 1.27). A significant treatment effect interaction between KRAS status and addition of anti-EGFR antibodies to standard treatment was found for PFS (ratio of HRs 0.71, 95%CI: 0.57, 0.90 p=0.005) and response rate difference (difference in RDs 15%, 95%CI: 8, 22%, p<0.001). There was no evidence that the extent of effect modification differed between chemotherapeutic partners for both PFS (p=0.3) and response rate (p=0.6). INTERPRETATION: KRAS mutation status is a treatment effect modifier for anti-EGFR antibodies in metastatic CRC. Further evidence is needed to determine whether this is true for all chemotherapy partners and all clinical circumstances.
机译:背景:在转移性结直肠癌(CRC)的情况下,目前不建议将抗EGFR抗体用于患有KRAS突变肿瘤的个体。这是基于对单个临床试验的亚组分析,而不是作为预测性生物标志物的KRAS状态的正式证据综合,而较新的试验报告,无论KRAS状态如何,抗EGFR抗体均无益处。这项研究系统地回顾了KRAS突变状态作为抗EGFR抗体反应的治疗效果修饰剂和伴侣化学疗法的影响的证据。方法:检索Medline(1966-2010),EMBASE和美国和欧洲肿瘤学会议摘要以寻找报告KRAS状态对转移性CRC中抗EGFR抗体有效性的影响的随机对照试验。通过KRAS状态总结治疗效果,使用危险比(HR)进行无进展生存(PFS),使用风险差(RD)进行客观反应。对于每项研究,均计算了效果改善的量度,并使用随机效果荟萃分析进行汇总,以评估KRAS与治疗效果之间的相互作用。结果:从198份报告中选择了11项研究(8924例患者)。两项研究评估了抗EGFR抗体作为单一疗法的价值,九项研究将其与化学疗法结合使用。报告了7555例KRAS状态。在亚组分析中,分配给抗EGFR抗体的KRAS野生患者的进展HR为0.80(4436例患者,95%CI:0.64,0.99),突变病例为1.11(3119例患者,95%CI:0.97,1.27)。对于PFS(HR比率0.71,95%CI:0.57,0.90 p = 0.005)和缓解率差异(RD差异15%, 95%CI:8、22%,p <0.001)。没有证据表明PFS(p = 0.3)和缓解率(p = 0.6)的化疗配偶之间效果改变的程度不同。解释:KRAS突变状态是转移性CRC中抗EGFR抗体的治疗效果修饰剂。需要进一步的证据来确定这是否适用于所有化疗伙伴和所有临床情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号