...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >A randomised, double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Final overall survival results and safety update
【24h】

A randomised, double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Final overall survival results and safety update

机译:帕唑帕尼在晚期和/或转移性肾细胞癌患者中的一项随机,双盲III期研究:最终总体生存结果和安全性更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: In this randomised phase III study (VEG105192; NCT00334282), pazopanib previously demonstrated statistically and clinically meaningful improvement of progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Final overall survival (OS) and updated safety results are now reported. Methods: Treatment-naive or cytokine-pretreated mRCC patients (n = 435) stratified and randomised (2:1) to pazopanib 800 mg daily or placebo, were treated until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. Upon progression, placebo patients could receive pazopanib through an open-label study. Final OS in the intent-to-treat population was analysed using a stratified log-rank test. Rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) and inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) analyses were performed post-hoc to adjust for crossover. Findings: The difference in final OS between pazopanib- and placebo-treated patients was not statistically significant (22.9 versus 20.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.16; one-sided P =.224). Early and frequent crossover from placebo to pazopanib and prolonged duration of crossover treatment confounded the OS analysis. In IPCW analyses, pazopanib decreased mortality (HR = 0.504; 95% CI, 0.315-0.762; two-sided P =.002). Similar, albeit non-significant, results were obtained in RPSFT analyses (HR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.215-1.388; two-sided P =.172). Since the last cutoff, cumulative exposure to pazopanib increased by 30%. The pazopanib safety profile showed no new safety signals or changes in the type, frequency and severity of adverse events. Interpretation: Although no significant difference in OS was observed in this study, extensive crossover from placebo to pazopanib confounded final OS analysis. Post-hoc analyses adjusting for crossover suggest OS benefit with pazopanib treatment for mRCC patients.
机译:背景:在这项随机的III期研究(VEG105192; NCT00334282)中,帕佐帕尼先前已证明在晚期/转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者中无进展生存率与安慰剂相比具有统计学和临床​​意义。现在报告最终总生存期(OS)和更新的安全性结果。方法:将未经治疗或经细胞因子预处理的mRCC患者(n = 435)分层并随机(2:1)接受每日800 mg帕唑帕尼或安慰剂治疗,直至疾病进展,死亡或无法接受的毒性。进展后,安慰剂患者可通过开放标签研究接受帕唑帕尼治疗。使用分层对数秩检验对意向性治疗人群的最终OS进行了分析。事后进行了保留等级的结构失效时间(RPSFT)和审查加权的逆概率(IPCW)分析,以进行交叉调整。研究结果:帕唑帕尼和安慰剂治疗的患者的最终OS差异无统计学意义(分别为22.9和20.5个月;危险比[HR] = 0.91; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.71-1.16;单侧P = .224)。从安慰剂到帕唑帕尼的早期且频繁的交叉以及长期的交叉治疗持续时间混淆了OS分析。在IPCW分析中,帕唑帕尼降低了死亡率(HR = 0.504; 95%CI,0.315-0.762;双面P = .002)。在RPSFT分析中获得了相似的结果,尽管意义不大(HR = 0.43; 95%CI,0.215-1.388;双面P = .172)。自上次截止以来,帕唑帕尼的累积暴露量增加了30%。帕唑帕尼的安全性资料未显示新的安全信号或不良事件的类型,频率和严重性发生变化。解释:尽管在这项研究中未观察到OS的显着差异,但从安慰剂到帕唑帕尼的广泛交叉混淆了最终OS分析。事后分析调整交叉表明,帕唑帕尼治疗mRCC患者具有OS获益。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号