...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study evaluating sorafenib in combination with paclitaxel as a first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer
【24h】

A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study evaluating sorafenib in combination with paclitaxel as a first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

机译:一项双盲,随机,安慰剂对照的2b期研究,评估索拉非尼联合紫杉醇作为HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌患者的一线治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: We conducted a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled screening trial to evaluate the addition of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib (antiproliferative/antiangiogenic) to first-line paclitaxel for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Patients were randomised to paclitaxel (90 mg/m2, weekly, intravenously, 3 weeks on/1 week off) plus sorafenib (400 mg, orally, twice daily) or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). A sample size of 220 patients was planned with relative risk ≤0.82 (1-sided α = 0.14) after 120 events supporting a treatment effect. Findings: Patients were randomised in India (n = 170), the United States (n = 52) and Brazil (n = 15). Median PFS was 6.9 months for sorafenib versus 5.6 months for placebo (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.788; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.558-1.112; P = 0.1715 [1-sided P = 0.0857]). The addition of sorafenib increased time to progression (median, 8.1 versus 5.6 months; HR = 0.674; 95% CI 0.465-0.975; P = 0.0343) and improved overall response (67% versus 54%; P = 0.0468). Overall survival did not statistically differ (median, 16.8 versus 17.4 months; HR = 1.022; 95% CI 0.715-1.461; P = 0.904). Grade 3/4 toxicities (sorafenib versus placebo) included hand-foot skin reaction (31% versus 3%), neutropenia (13% versus 7%) and anaemia (11% versus 6%). Two treatment-related deaths occurred (malaria and liver dysfunction) in the sorafenib arm. Interpretation: The addition of sorafenib to paclitaxel improved disease control but did not significantly improve PFS to support a phase 3 trial of similar design. Toxicity of the combination was manageable with dose reductions. Funding: Northwestern University, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals.
机译:背景:我们进行了一项2b期随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的筛选试验,以评估在人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性的一线紫杉醇中添加多激酶抑制剂索拉非尼(抗增殖/抗血管生成)局部复发/转移性乳腺癌。方法:将患者随机分为紫杉醇(90 mg / m2,每周一次,静脉内,3周一次/ 1周关闭)加索拉非尼(400 mg,口服,每天两次)或安慰剂。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。 120例支持治疗效果的事件后,计划对220名患者进行抽样,相对风险≤0.82(1面α= 0.14)。研究结果:患者被随机分配到印度(n = 170),美国(n = 52)和巴西(n = 15)。索拉非尼的PFS中位数为6.9个月,而安慰剂为5.6个月(危险比(HR)= 0.788; 95%置信区间(CI)为0.558-1.112; P = 0.1715 [1面P = 0.0857])。索拉非尼的添加增加了病情发展的时间(中位值分别为8.1个月和5.6个月; HR = 0.674; 95%CI 0.465-0.975; P = 0.0343)并改善了总体缓解率(67%vs 54%; P = 0.0468)。总生存期无统计学差异(中位值分别为16.8和17.4个月; HR = 1.022; 95%CI 0.715-1.461; P = 0.904)。 3/4级毒性(索拉非尼与安慰剂)包括手足皮肤反应(31%对3%),中性粒细胞减少症(13%对7%)和贫血(11%对6%)。索拉非尼组发生了两次与治疗有关的死亡(疟疾和肝功能障碍)。解释:将索拉非尼加入紫杉醇可以改善疾病控制,但不能显着改善PFS,以支持类似设计的3期试验。通过降低剂量可以控制组合的毒性。资金来源:西北大学,玛瑙药业,拜耳医疗保健药业。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号