首页> 外文期刊>European journal of emergency medicine: Official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine >Comparison of traditional and interactive teaching methods in a UK emergency department.
【24h】

Comparison of traditional and interactive teaching methods in a UK emergency department.

机译:英国急诊科中传统和互动式教学方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Didactic teaching remains a core component of undergraduate education, but developing computer assisted learning (CAL) packages may provide useful alternatives. We compared the effectiveness of interactive multimedia-based tutorials with traditional, lecture-based models for teaching arterial blood gas interpretation to fourth year medical students. Participants were randomized to complete a tutorial in either lecture or multimedia format containing identical content. Upon completion, students answered five multiple choice questions assessing post-tutorial knowledge, and provided feedback on their allocated learning method. Marks revealed no significant difference between either group. All lecture candidates rated their teaching as good, compared with 89% of the CAL group. All CAL users found multiple choice questions assessment useful, compared with 83% of lecture participants. Both groups highlighted the importance of interaction. CAL complements other teaching methods, but should be seen as an adjunct to, rather than a replacement for, traditional methods, thus offering students a blended learning environment.
机译:教学法仍然是本科教育的核心组成部分,但是开发计算机辅助学习(CAL)软件包可能会提供有用的替代方法。我们将交互式多媒体教程与传统的基于讲座的模型对四年级医学生进行动脉血气解释教学的效果进行了比较。参与者被随机分配以包含相同内容的讲座或多媒体格式完成教程。完成后,学生回答了五个选择题,评估了教程后的知识,并提供了关于他们分配的学习方法的反馈。痕迹显示两组之间无显着差异。与CAL组的89%相比,所有演讲者都将他们的教学评为好。所有CAL用户都认为多项选择题评估很有用,而参​​加讲座的参与者为83%。两组都强调了互动的重要性。 CAL是对其他教学方法的补充,但应被视为对传统方法的补充,而不是对其的替代,从而为学生提供了一个混合的学习环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号