【24h】

Comment on Gialluisi et al

机译:Gialluisi等人如何

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As authors of the first paper describing the methodology used by Gialluisi et al in their paper on the high allele frequency for Wilson disease in the Sardinian population, we want to congratulate them with their result. The paper clearly shows the strength of this methodology. We were also particularly impressed by their conscientious approach to determine the inbreeding coefficient in this special population. Still we want to draw attention to some inaccuracies in their paper, which-in our opinion-should be avoided by future users of this method, as they may result in underestimation of the gene frequency - ie, the total pathogenic allele frequency-and birth prevalence of the disorder. First of all, the authors disregard 14 mutations with relative frequencies below 1%. By including these, the gene frequency becomes 0.0195, instead of 0.0191. Second, the authors included only patients with unambiguous genotype and detailed geographical provenance of parents. However, leaving out seemingly heterozygous patients with a second, unidentified mutation will have the same effect on the estimation of the gene frequency as disregarding known mutations.
机译:正如第一篇论文的作者描述了Gialluisi等人在其关于撒丁岛人群中威尔逊病的高等位基因频率的论文中所使用的方法论一样,我们要向他们表示祝贺。本文清楚地表明了这种方法的优势。他们为确定这一特殊群体的近交系数而采取的认真态度也给我们留下了深刻的印象。我们仍然希望引起他们论文中的一些错误,我们认为该方法的未来使用者应避免这种错误,因为它们可能会导致基因频率的低估,即总致病性等位基因频率和出生率疾病的患病率。首先,作者忽略了相对频率低于1%的14个突变。通过包括这些,基因频率变为0.0195,而不是0.0191。其次,作者仅包括基因型明确且父母的详细地理来源的患者。但是,如果将看似杂合的患者排除在外,则有第二个未确认的突变将对基因频率的估计具有与忽略已知突变相同的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号